The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods of Theoretical Physics
Morse, P. M., Feshbach, H., & Hill, E. L. (1954) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1933765 · Cited by 13,197
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Aarons, 1964, Visual apparent movement research: Review, 1935–1955, and Bibliography, 1955–1963, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18, 239, 10.2466/pms.1964.18.1.239 · DOI
- Barlow, 1957, Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation, J. Physiol., 137, 338, 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005817 · DOI · Paper page
- Békésy, 1960, Neural inhibitory units of the eye and skin. Quantitative description of contrast phenomena, J. opt. Soc. Am., 50, 1060, 10.1364/JOSA.50.001060 · DOI
- Bowditch, 1882, Optical illusions of motion, J. Physiol., 3, 297, 10.1113/jphysiol.1882.sp000103 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1882.sp000103
- Kuffler, 1953, Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina, J. Neurophysiol., 16, 37, 10.1152/jn.1953.16.1.37 · DOI · Paper page
- Kuffler, 1957, Maintained activity in the cat's retina in light and darkness, J. gen. Physiol., 40, 683, 10.1085/jgp.40.5.683 · DOI · Paper page
- Mach, 1865, Über die Wirkung der räumlichen Vertheilung des Lichtreizes auf die Netzhaut—I, Stizber. Akad Wiss. Wien Math, Naturw. KI, II, 52, 303
- Ogawa, 1965, Temporal characteristics of responses to photic stimulation by single ganglion cells in the unopened eye of the cat, J. Neurophysiol.
- Ratliff, 1959, The response of Limulus optic nerve fibres to patterns of illumination on the retinal mosaic, J. gen. Physiol., 42, 1241, 10.1085/jgp.42.6.1241 · DOI · Paper page
- Rodieck, 1965, Response of cat retinal ganglion cells to moving visual patterns, J. Neurophysiol., 10.1152/jn.1965.28.5.819 · DOI
- Rodieck, 1965, Analysis of receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cells, J. Neurophysiol., 10.1152/jn.1965.28.5.833 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Daugman, J. G. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.001160 · Cited by 3,219
The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat
Enroth-Cugell, C., & Robson, J. G. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107 · Cited by 2,625
Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles
Daugman, J. G. (1980) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(80)90065-6 · Cited by 1,208
Dan, Y., Atick, J. J., & Reid, R. C. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-10-03351.1996 · Cited by 478
Connor, C., & Johnson, K. (1992) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.12-09-03414.1992 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodieck, R. W.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1965-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 583-601
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965673217
- Cited by
- 764
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0042-6989(65)90033-7
- The paper
- Rodieck, R. W. (1965). Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(65)90033-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
