Cited by 300Tactile and Sensory InteractionsVisual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and Adaptation

Neural coding of tactile texture: comparison of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception

Open access
Connor, CE, Johnson, KO·1992·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

A previous study showed that roughness perception may depend on either temporal or spatial variations in firing rate among cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents. The present study was designed to distinguish between these hypotheses. Plastic surfaces embossed with patterns of dots designed to produce predictable alterations in temporal and spatial firing rate variation were used as stimuli in psychophysical and neurophysiological experiments. Subjective roughness magnitudes obtained from psychophysical experiments fitted the predictions of the spatial but not the temporal hypothesis. In the neurophysiological experiments, the stimuli were scanned across the receptive fields of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents. Firing rate variation in the neural responses was measured using a range of temporal and spatial filters. Temporal variation was not correlated with roughness magnitude. Spatial variation, on a scale of 1–2 mm (one to two receptor spacings), was closely correlated with roughness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.12-09-03414.1992

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coarse textural features are encoded in the spatial pattern of activation in SA1 and perhaps also RA afferents.

    “Coarse textural features are encoded in the spatial pattern of activation in SA1 and perhaps also RA afferents (Connor et al., 1990;Connor and Johnson, 1992).”

    From Biomimetic approaches to bionic touch through a peripheral nerve interface (2015) · cites this paper as Connor and Johnson, 1992

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lederman SJ (1982) The perception of texture by touch. In: Tactual perception: a sourcebook (Schiff W, Foulke E, eds), pp 130-167. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Connor, C., & Johnson, K.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1992-09-01
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
3414-3426
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1759209953
Cited by
300
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • W. M. Keck Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS18787, R01NS018787)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
tactile texture, roughness perception, neural coding, cutaneous mechanoreceptors, spatial coding, temporal coding, receptive fields, dot patterns, psychophysics
MeSH terms
Adult, Electrophysiology, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Mechanoreceptors, Neurons, Afferent, Neurophysiology, Perception, Psychophysics, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Surface Properties, Time Factors, Touch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review