Cited by 202Policing Practices and PerceptionsGun Ownership and Violence ResearchCriminal Justice and Penology

Administrative interventions on police shooting discretion: An empirical examination

Fyfe, James J.·1979·Journal of Criminal Justice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0047-2352(79)90065-5

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fyfe, J. J.
Affiliations
National Policing Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Fyfe, James J.
Venue
Journal of Criminal Justice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1979-12
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
309-323
ISSN
0047-2352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046524129
Cited by
202
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Criminal Justice (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
New York City Police Department, protection of life, police use of force, police officer deaths, police assault

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review