Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Capitalism as an engine of progress

Open access
Nelson, Richard R.·1990·Research Policy

Abstract

Economists, from Marx, to Schumpeter, have touted capitalism as an engine of technical progress. But what kind of an engine is it? How does it work? What are the strengths and weaknesses? This essay hazards some answers to these questions.1 Section 1 is a broad theoretical assessment that begins with Joseph Schumpeter's seminal analysis of technical advance as an evolutionary process, but augments it, and then diverges from it in important ways. In particular, it develops the point that the relationships among science and technology, and the institutional structures supporting scientific and technical advance, are much more complex than Schumpeter and scholars following in his tradition have recognized. Section 2 is the heart of the essay. It draws on a wide range of recent scholarship to describe the different parts of the modern capitalist engine, what they do, and how they mesh. Based on the foregoing, Section 3 develops a particular view of the current debate about strengthening mechanisms to facilitate R&D planning and coordination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0048-7333(90)90036-6

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Nelson, R. R.
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-06
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
193-214
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086656505
Cited by
354
References
4
FWCI
35.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.