Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development
Open accessAbstract
Sustainable development requires changes in socio-technical systems and wider societal change – in beliefs, values and governance that co-evolve with technology changes. In this article we present a practical model for managing processes of co-evolution: transition management. Transition management is a multilevel model of governance which shapes processes of co-evolution using visions, transition experiments and cycles of learning and adaptation. Transition management helps societies to transform themselves in a gradual, reflexive way through guided processes of variation and selection, the outcomes of which are stepping stones for further change. It shows that societies can break free from existing practices and technologies, by engaging in co-evolutionary steering. This is illustrated by the Dutch waste management transition. Perhaps transition management constitutes the third way that policy scientists have been looking for all the time, combining the advantages of incrementalism (based on mutual adaptation) with the advantages of planning (based on long-term objectives).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It can take a whole generation or longer for innovations to unfold their full transformative potential and to develop competitive business case drivers.
“Such policies must be reliable in the long run because it can take a whole generation (or even longer) for innovations to unfold their full transformative potential (Kemp, Loorbach, & Rotmans, 2007;Mowery et al., 2010) and to develop competitive business case drivers, such as reduced costs and risks for customers or the reputation of a whole class of new technologies.”
From Sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and business models: Integrative framework and propositions for future research (2020) · cites this paper as Kemp et al., 2007
Cites
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lüdeke‐Freund, F. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2396 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Triggering Change: Towards a Conceptualisation of Major Change Processes in Farm Decision-Making
Sutherland, L.-A., Burton, R. J. F., Ingram, J., Blackstock, K., Slee, B., & Gotts, N. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.013 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
The impacts of household consumption and options for change
Tukker, A., Cohen, M. J., Hubacek, K., & Mont, O. (2010) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00208.x · Cited by 249 · see citing works
The Anatomy of Circular Economy Transition in the Fashion Industry
Mishra, S., Jain, S., & Malhotra, G. (2021) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/srj-06-2019-0216 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Scholz, R. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9060991 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Kouroubali, A., & Katehakis, D. G. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103166 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Demonstration projects in transition processes to sustainable energy and transport
Klitkou, A. (2016) · International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy · doi:10.1504/ijfip.2016.078370 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J.
- Affiliations
- United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (NL)
- Venue
- International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-91
- ISSN
- 1350-4509 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2627
- OpenAlex
- W2126498825
- Cited by
- 900
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 18.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.eur.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Keywords
- transition management, coevolution, sustainable development, multi-level governance, transition experiments, learning and adaptation, social change, steering, incrementalism, long-term planning, socio-technical systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review