Cited by 900Sustainability and Climate Change GovernancePolicy Transfer and LearningInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development

Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development

Open access
Kemp, René, Loorbach, Derk, Rotmans, Jan·2007·International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology

Abstract

Sustainable development requires changes in socio-technical systems and wider societal change – in beliefs, values and governance that co-evolve with technology changes. In this article we present a practical model for managing processes of co-evolution: transition management. Transition management is a multilevel model of governance which shapes processes of co-evolution using visions, transition experiments and cycles of learning and adaptation. Transition management helps societies to transform themselves in a gradual, reflexive way through guided processes of variation and selection, the outcomes of which are stepping stones for further change. It shows that societies can break free from existing practices and technologies, by engaging in co-evolutionary steering. This is illustrated by the Dutch waste management transition. Perhaps transition management constitutes the third way that policy scientists have been looking for all the time, combining the advantages of incrementalism (based on mutual adaptation) with the advantages of planning (based on long-term objectives).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13504500709469709

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It can take a whole generation or longer for innovations to unfold their full transformative potential and to develop competitive business case drivers.

    “Such policies must be reliable in the long run because it can take a whole generation (or even longer) for innovations to unfold their full transformative potential (Kemp, Loorbach, & Rotmans, 2007;Mowery et al., 2010) and to develop competitive business case drivers, such as reduced costs and risks for customers or the reputation of a whole class of new technologies.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J.
Affiliations
United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (NL)
Venue
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology
Published
2007-02
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
78-91
ISSN
  • 1350-4509 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2627
OpenAlex
W2126498825
Cited by
900
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 87 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 40
FWCI
18.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Keywords
transition management, coevolution, sustainable development, multi-level governance, transition experiments, learning and adaptation, social change, steering, incrementalism, long-term planning, socio-technical systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review