Cited by 43Social and Intergroup PsychologyElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationRace, History, and American Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cohorts, education, and the evolution of tolerance

Smith, A.Wade·1985·Social Science Research

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0049-089x(85)90002-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results regarding age differences are only partly in accordance with previous findings that the young are less nationalistic and less prejudiced.

    “Regarding age differences, the results are only partly in accordance with previous findings that indicate that the young are less nationalistic and less prejudiced (Eisinga & Scheepers, 1989; Smith, 1985).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Bellingsfield, 1972, Current research: white attitudes toward racial integration and the urban riots of the 1960's, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 579, 10.1086/268040 · DOI
  2. Blumer, 1958, Race prejudice as a sense of group position, Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 307, 10.2307/1388607 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Condran, 1979, Changes in white attitudes towards blacks, 1963–1977, Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 463, 10.1086/268544 · DOI
  4. Davis, 1974, Concepts and procedures for constructing odds ratio models for causally ordered multivariate contingency tables, Vol. 1
  5. Davis, 1975, Background characteristics of the U.S. adult population, 1952–1972, a survey metric model, Vol. 2
  6. Davis, 1975, Communism, conformity, cohorts, and categories: American tolerance in 1954 and 1972–1973, American Journal of Sociology, 81, 491, 10.1086/226105 · DOI
  7. Davis, 1978, Studying categorical data over time, Social Science Research, 7, 151, 10.1016/0049-089X(78)90009-1 · DOI
  8. Evan, 1959, Cohort analysis of survey data, Public Opinion Quarterly, 38, 63, 10.1086/266846 · DOI
  9. Glenn, 1976, Cohort analysts' futile quest: statistical attempts to separate age, period, and cohort effects, American Sociological Review, 46, 900, 10.2307/2094738 · DOI
  10. Glenn, 1981, Age, birth cohorts, and drinking: an illustration of the hazards of inferring effects from cohort data, Journal of Gerontology, 36, 362, 10.1093/geronj/36.3.362 · DOI
  11. Greeley, 1971, Attitudes toward desegregation, Scientific American, 210, 13, 10.1038/scientificamerican1271-13 · DOI
  12. Grizzle, 1969, Analysis of categorical data by linear models, Biometrics, 25, 489, 10.2307/2528901 · DOI
  13. Hyman, 1956, Attitudes toward desegregation, Scientific American, 195, 35, 10.1038/scientificamerican1256-35 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hyman, 1964, White attitudes toward desegregation, Scientific American, 203, 16, 10.1038/scientificamerican0764-16 · DOI
  15. Knapp, 1972, White parental acceptance of varying degrees of school desegregation, 1965 and 1970, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 585, 10.1086/268041 · DOI
  16. Longshore, 1982, Race composition and white hostility: a research note on the problem of control in desegregated schools, Social Forces, 61, 73, 10.1093/sf/61.1.73 · DOI
  17. Longshore, 1982, School racial composition and blacks' attitudes toward desegregation: the problem of control in desegregated schools, Social Science Quarterly, 63, 674
  18. Mason, 1973, Some methodological issues in cohort analysis of archival data, American Sociological Review, 38, 242, 10.2307/2094398 · DOI
  19. Pettigrew, 1957, Desegregation and its chances of success: Northern and Southern views, Social Forces, 35, 339, 10.2307/2573324 · DOI
  20. Ryder, 1965, The cohort as a concept in the study of social change, American Sociological Review, 30, 843, 10.2307/2090964 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Sheatsley, 1965, White attitudes toward the Negro, Daedalus, 217
  22. Smith, 1981, Tolerance of school desegregation, 1954–1977, Social Forces, 59, 1256, 10.1093/sf/59.4.1256 · DOI
  23. Smith, 1982, Continuing trends in white attitudes toward school desegregation, 1954–1980, Pacific Sociological Review, 25, 3, 10.2307/1388885 · DOI
  24. Smith, 1982, White attitudes toward residential integration, Phylon, 43, 349, 10.2307/274759 · DOI
  25. Smith, 1978, In search of house effects: a comparison of responses to various questions by different survey organizations, Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 443, 10.1086/268473 · DOI
  26. Swafford, 1980, Three parametric techniques for contingency table analysis: a non-technical commentary, American Sociological Review, 45, 664, 10.2307/2095015 · DOI
  27. Taylor, 1980, Procedures for evaluating trends in public opinion, Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 86, 10.1086/268568 · DOI
  28. Taylor, 1978, Attitudes toward desegregation, Scientific American, 238, 42, 10.1038/scientificamerican0678-42 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Smith, A. W.
Affiliations
National Opinion Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, A.Wade
Venue
Social Science Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985-09
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
205-225
ISSN
0049-089X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129236927
Cited by
43
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Science Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
racial tolerance, racial attitudes, cohort effects, educational attainment, normative explanation, generational change, racial conservatism, racial liberalism, attitude change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review