Cited by 78Marine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFish Ecology and Management Studies

Species composition, distribution, and invertebrate prey of fish assemblages in the Columbia River estuary

Bottom, Daniel L., Jones, Kim K.·1990·Progress in Oceanography

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0079-6611(90)90009-q

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bottom, D. L., & Jones, K. K.
Affiliations
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (US)
Venue
Progress in Oceanography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990
Volume
25
Issue
1-4
Pages
243-270
ISSN
0079-6611 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020356199
Cited by
78
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Progress In Oceanography (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Oregon State University
  • National Science Foundation (EPP75-08901)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
Columbia River estuary, fish community composition, fish distribution, invertebrate prey, stomach fullness, seasonal variation, anadromous fish, euryhaline species, salinity zones, river discharge, fish production, turbidity, estuarine habitat use, Pacific Northwest estuaries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review