Cited by 251Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorNursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Economic, psychological, and sociological determinants of voluntary turnover

Mueller, Charles W., Price, James L.·1990·Journal of Behavioral Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0090-5720(90)90034-5

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mueller, C. W., & Price, J. L.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Mueller, Charles W.
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-09
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
321-335
ISSN
0090-5720 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092129038
Cited by
250
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
voluntary turnover, employee turnover, registered nurses, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, intention to stay, working conditions, Etzioni

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review