The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the formation of spontaneous deletions: The importance of short sequence homologies in the generation of large deletions
Open accessAbstract
Using lacl-Z fusion strains of Escherichia coli we have devised systems that detect deletions of varying lengths. We examined deletions 700-1000 base pairs long, and genetically characterized over 250 spontaneous deletions. Of these, we analyzed 24 by direct DNA sequencing and 18 by inspection of restriction fragment patterns. Deletions of this size occur almost exclusively at short repeated sequences in both (recA+ and recA- strain backgrounds, but are detected 25-fold more frequently in a recA+ background. The frequency of deletion formation correlates with the extent of homology between the short repeated sequences, although other factors may be involved. The largest hotspot, which accounts for 60% of the deletions detected, involves the largest homology in the system (14 of 17 base pairs). Altering a single base pair within this homology reduces deletion incidence by an order of magnitude. We discuss possible mechanisms of deletion formation and consider its relationship to the excision of transposable elements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA
Birnboim, H. C., & Doly, J. (1979) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/7.6.1513 · Cited by 14,686
The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations
Lea, D. E., & Coulson, C. A. (1949) · Journal of Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf02986080 · Cited by 1,450
Frameshift Mutations and the Genetic Code
Streisinger, G., Okada, Y., Emrich, J., Newton, J., Tsugita, A., Terzaghi, E., & Inouye, M. (1966) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1966.031.01.014 · Cited by 1,400
Cited by
Mechanisms of change in gene copy number
Hastings, P. J., Lupski, J. R., Rosenberg, S. M., & Ira, G. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2593 · Cited by 1,316
Link, A. J., Phillips, D., & Church, G. M. (1997) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.179.20.6228-6237.1997 · Cited by 874
Gaillard, J.-L., Berche, P., Frehel, C., Gouln, E., & Cossart, P. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90009-n · Cited by 835
Hastings, P. J., Ira, G., & Lupski, J. R. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000327 · Cited by 818
Pearson's marrow–pancreas syndrome. A multisystem mitochondrial disorder in infancy
Rötig, A., Cormier, V, Blanche, S., Bonnefont, J. P., Ledeist, F., Romero, N., Schmitz, J., Rustin, P., Fischer, A., & Saudubray, J. M. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci114881 · Cited by 461
Metadata
- Authors
- Albertini, A. M., Hofer, M., Calos, M. P., & Miller, J. H.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1982-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 319-328
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038265624
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the formation of spontaneous deletions: The importance of short sequence homologies in the generation of large deletions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0092-8674(82)90148-9
- The paper
- Albertini, A. M., Hofer, M., Calos, M. P., & Miller, J. H. (1982). On the formation of spontaneous deletions: The importance of short sequence homologies in the generation of large deletions. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(82)90148-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.