The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don't … sometimes, some places
Open accessAbstract
This study investigated spreading activation for words presented to the left and right hemispheres using an automatic semantic priming paradigm. Three types of semantic relations were used: similar-only (Deer-Pony), associated-only (Bee-Honey), and similar + associated (Doctor-Nurse). Priming of lexical decisions was symmetrical over visual fields for all semantic relations when prime words were centrally presented. However, when primes and targets were lateralized to the same visual field, similar-only priming was greater in the LVF than in the RVF, no priming was obtained for associated-only words, and priming was equivalent over visual fields for similar + associated words. Similar results were found using a naming task. These findings suggest that it is important to lateralize both prime and target information to assess hemisphere-specific spreading activation processes. Further, while spreading activation occurs in either hemisphere for the most highly related words (those related by category membership and association), our findings suggest that automatic access to semantic category relatedness occurs primarily in the right cerebral hemisphere. These results imply a unique role for the right hemisphere in the processing of word meanings. We relate our results to our previous proposal (Burgess & Simpson, 1988a; Chiarello, 1988c) that there is rapid selection of one meaning and suppression of other candidates in the left hemisphere, while activation spreads more diffusely in the right hemisphere. We also outline a new proposal that activation spreads in a different manner for associated words than for words related by semantic similarity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407 · Cited by 8,141
(1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,532
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.5.375 · Cited by 4,889
Cummins, R., & Fodor, J. (1985) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184717 · Cited by 4,791
Neely, J. H. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.106.3.226 · Cited by 2,828
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027577 · Cited by 2,570
Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium
Brown, A. S., & Solso, R. L. (1976) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421430 · Cited by 2,382
Attention And Cognitive Control 1
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (2024) · Information Processing and Cognition · doi:10.4324/9781032722450-4 · Cited by 2,264
The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research
Clark, H. H. (1973) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(73)80014-3 · Cited by 2,222
Reading Research Advances in Theory and Practice
Besner, D., Waller, T. G., & MacKinnon, G. E. (1985) · Cited by 1,618
Cited by
Dependency-Based Word Embeddings
Levy, O., & Goldberg, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-2050 · Cited by 1,047
Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension
Federmeier, K. D. (2007) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.x · Cited by 801
The cognitive neuroscience of insight
Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115154 · Cited by 654
Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon.
Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.1.1 · Cited by 613
Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review
Hutchison, K. A. (2003) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196544 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiarello, C., Burgess, C., Richards, L., & Pollock, A.
- Venue
- Brain and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-104
- ISSN
- 0093-934X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074657344
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don't … sometimes, some places. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0093-934x(90)90103-n
- The paper
- Chiarello, C., Burgess, C., Richards, L., & Pollock, A. (1990). Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don't … sometimes, some places. Brain and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934x(90)90103-n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.