The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designerly ways of knowing
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
Lakatos, I. (1970) · Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171434.009 · Cited by 4,649
Cited by
The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the "Other"
Bennett, C. L., & Rosner, D. K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300528 · Cited by 413
Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy
Dow, S. P., Glassco, A., Kass, J., Schwarz, M., Schwartz, D. L., & Klemmer, S. R. (2010) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/1879831.1879836 · Cited by 367
Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking
Oxman, R. (2017) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.001 · Cited by 312
Schemata, gambits and precedent: some factors in design expertise
Lawson, B. (2004) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.001 · Cited by 271
Thing Ethnography: Doing Design Research with Non-Humans
Giaccardi, E., Cila, N., Speed, C., & Caldwell, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems · doi:10.1145/2901790.2901905 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Cross, N.
- Venue
- Design Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1982-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 221-227
- ISSN
- 0142-694X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4293258648
- Cited by
- 1,499
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designerly ways of knowing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0142-694x(82)90040-0
- The paper
- Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(82)90040-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
