The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
Checkoway, B., & Schon, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324262 · Cited by 21,268
The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
Stewart, C. J. (1984) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/0738-3991(84)90022-3 · Cited by 19,752
(1987) · Cited by 6,910
Thompson, D. W. (2019) · Stripped Bare · doi:10.1515/9780691183978-018 · Cited by 4,177
Rowe, P. G. (1987) · Cited by 2,481
Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution
Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(01)00009-6 · Cited by 2,357
(2006) · Designerly Ways of Knowing · doi:10.1007/1-84628-301-9_1 · Cited by 1,815
Lawson, B. (2006) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780080454979 · Cited by 1,584
Cross, N. (1982) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/0142-694x(82)90040-0 · Cited by 1,499
Damon, S. (1992) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.1.1.81 · Cited by 750
Cited by
A Review of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Architectural Design Efficiency
Li, Y., Chen, H., Yu, P., & Yang, L. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15031476 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Oxman, R.
- Venue
- Design Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 4-39
- ISSN
- 0142-694X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2729766942
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 243.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.001
- The paper
- Oxman, R. (2017). Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking. Design Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
