Parental involvement in sexual abuse prevention education
Abstract
Parental knowledge of child sexual abuse and interest in educating themselves and their children for primary prevention was studied. Fifty-one mothers and 50 fathers of preschool and day-care center children were interviewed. Parents wanted to be the primary educators of their child, but demonstrated a lack of knowledge about important sexual abuse issues and planned to discuss only the least threatening topics. Mothers and fathers obtained most of their information about sexual abuse from the media. However, parents were open to numerous methods and referral sources for prevention education. One dependent variable, sex of parent, showed significant differences on sources of sexual abuse information; preferred educators for their children; number and types of topics acceptable for children to learn about at preschool ages or other times; the number of topics parents planned to discuss; sources parents would respond to most for a parent program; and factors in parent's decision to attend parent programs. There were no significant differences based upon the sex of the child and no significant interaction effects between sex of parent and sex of child. Further research on parent motivation for their own education and the education of their children is indicated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Parents rely on the media as a major source of information about child sexual abuse.
“Parents utilize the media as a major source of their information about CSA (Elrod & Rubin, 1993)”
From Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Opportunities: Parenting, Programs, and the Reduction of Risk (2018) · cites this paper as Elrod & Rubin, 1993
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Opportunities: Parenting, Programs, and the Reduction of Risk
Rudolph, J., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Shanley, D. C., & Hawkins, R. (2018) · Child Maltreatment · doi:10.1177/1077559517729479 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: Parental Discussion, Protective Practices and Attitudes
Rudolph, J. I., Walsh, K., Shanley, D. C., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2022) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605211072258 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Elrod, J. M., & Rubin, R. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rubin, Roger H.
- Venue
- Child Abuse & Neglect
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 527-538
- ISSN
- 0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131136257
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Keywords
- child sexual abuse, sexual abuse prevention, parental involvement, primary prevention, parent education, parental knowledge, preschool children, daycare children, media as information source, parent programs, gender differences in parenting, child sexual abuse education, parental motivation, referral sources
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Curriculum, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Education, Sex Factors, Teaching, Program Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review