Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949 · see citing works
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673 · see citing works
The common ingroup identity model: recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779343000004 · Cited by 1,559 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926617 · Cited by 10,274 · see citing works
Boundary spanners’ identification, intergroup contact, and effective intergroup relations
Richter, A. W., West, M. A., van Dick, R., & Dawson, J. F. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.23478720 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Understanding and influencing the stigma of mental illness
Corrigan, P. W., & Wassel, A. (2008) · Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services · doi:10.3928/02793695-20080101-04 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Changing Interracial Evaluations and Behavior: The Effects of a Common Group Identity
Nier, J. A., Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M., & Rust, M. C. (2001) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430201004004001 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationLeading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.
Homan, A. C., Gündemir, S., Buengeler, C., & van Kleef, G. A. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000482 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Eisenberg, J., & Mattarelli, E. (2017) · Journal of International Management · doi:10.1016/j.intman.2016.11.007 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Delaware (US)
- Colgate University (US)
- Siena College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gaertner, Samuel L.
- ORCID
- Dovidio, John F.
- Venue
- International Journal of Intercultural Relations
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 271-290
- ISSN
- 0147-1767 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025438728
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 21.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Intercultural Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- contact hypothesis, common ingroup identity, superordinate identity, intergroup bias, intergroup conflict, dual identity, outgroup attitudes, egalitarian norms, corporate mergers, intergroup relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
