Cited by 399Environmental Education and SustainabilityEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessEnvironmental Sustainability and Education

Do we know what we need to know? Objective and subjective knowledge effects on pro-ecological behaviors

Ellen, Pam Scholder·1994·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0148-2963(94)90067-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellen, P. S.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
Ellen, Pam Scholder
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-05
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
43-52
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965328107
Cited by
399
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Sustainability and Education
Keywords
objective knowledge, perceived knowledge, recycling behavior, pollution prevention, environmental attitudes, environmental concern, environmental education, environmental labelling, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review