Spearman's Hypothesis tested with chronometric information-processing tasks
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The search yielded an additional two studies and four effect sizes from studies reporting data based on scholastic attainment criteria or g loadings from elementary cognitive tasks.
“This yielded an additional two studies and four effect sizes (Jensen, 1993;Warne, 2016).”
From A Meta-Analysis of Spearman’s Hypothesis in the United States (2026) · cites this paper as Jensen, 1993
Chronometric variables from elementary cognitive tasks show clear Black/White differences predicted by their g loadings.
“The chronometric variables derived from such ECTs show clear Black/White differences that are predicted by their g loadings [7].”
From Spearman’s Hypothesis Tested on Black Adults: A Meta-Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [7]
Jensen's use of congruence coefficients does not prove measurement invariance.
“Jensen's use of congruence coefficients, for instance, does not prove measurement invariance.”
From Spearman’s Hypothesis Tested on Black Adults: A Meta-Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as Jensen [7]
In the other data points in the meta-analysis, the authors do not carry out the statistical analyses suggested by Jensen [7].
“Indeed, in the other data points in our meta-analysis we do not carry out the statistical analyses suggested by Jensen [7]”
From Spearman’s Hypothesis Tested on Black Adults: A Meta-Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as Jensen [7]
Samples in the included studies should not be selected on a highly g-loaded variable.
“Second, the samples in the studies should not be selected on a highly g-loaded variable (e.g., referral or gifted samples [7]).”
From Spearman’s Hypothesis Tested on Black Adults: A Meta-Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [7]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability.
Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2005) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Self-citationRushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2010) · The Open Psychology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874350101003010009 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationSpearman’s Hypothesis Tested on Black Adults: A Meta-Analysis
Te Nijenhuis, J., & Van den Hoek, M. (2016) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence4020006 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
A Meta-Analysis of Spearman’s Hypothesis in the United States
Woodley of Menie, M., Peñaherrera-Aguirre, M., & Sarraf, M. (2026) · Intelligence & Cognitive Abilities · doi:10.65550/001c.171909
- Authors
- Jensen, A. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jensen, Arthur R.
- Venue
- Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-77
- ISSN
- 0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104249128
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 7.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- Spearman's hypothesis, general intelligence, reaction time, information processing tasks, Raven's Progressive Matrices, cognitive ability, elementary school students, cultural bias in testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
