Cited by 457Cognitive Abilities and TestingRace, Genetics, and SocietyIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability.

Rushton, J. Philippe, Jensen, Arthur R.·2005·Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Abstract

The culture-only (0 % genetic–100 % environmental) and the hereditarian (50% genetic–50 % environmental) models of the causes of mean Black–White differences in cognitive ability are compared and contrasted across 10 categories of evidence: the worldwide distribution of test scores, g factor of mental ability, heritability, brain size and cognitive ability, transracial adoption, racial admixture, regression, related life-history traits, human origins research, and hypothesized environmental variables. The new evidence reviewed here points to some genetic component in Black–White differences in mean IQ. The implication for public policy is that the discrimination model (i.e., Black–White differences in socially valued outcomes will be equal barring discrimination) must be tempered by a distributional model (i.e., Black–White outcomes reflect underlying group characteristics). Section 1: Background Throughout the history of psychology, no question has been so persistent or so resistant to resolution as that of the relative roles of nature and nurture in causing individual and group differences in cognitive ability (Degler, 1991;

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235

Cites

255 of 255 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This estimate of between-group heritability is consistent with Rushton and Jensen's hereditarian model, according to which 50%-80% of African-/European-American cognitive difference is due to genetic differences.

    “This estimate of between-group heritability is consistent with Rushton and Jensen's [9] hereditarian model, according to which 50%-80% of the African-/European-American cognitive difference is due to genetic differences.”

    From Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

  • The above-average mean IQ of severely malnourished East Asian infants adopted into White European homes is more consistent with a genetic than a cultural advantage.

    “However, the above-average mean IQ of even severely malnourished East Asian infants adopted into White European homes is more consistent with those infants having a genetic than a cultural advantage over their White European peers.”

    From What if the hereditarian hypothesis is true? (2005) · cites this paper as Rushton & Jensen, 2005

  • The hereditarian hypothesis is that Black-White differences in general intelligence (IQ, or g) are substantially genetic in origin, quantified as 50% genetic and 50% environmental.

    “Rushton and Jensen's (2005) hereditarian hypothesis is that Black-White differences in general intelligence (IQ, or the general mental ability factor, g ) are 'substantially' genetic in origin, which they quantify as 50% genetic and 50% environmental.”

    From What if the hereditarian hypothesis is true? (2005) · cites this paper as Rushton & Jensen, 2005

  • By undermining culture-only explanations of racial inequality, the hereditarian hypothesis undermines the moral legitimacy of all rationales for racial equalization that posit White misbehavior as its cause.

    “By undermining culture-only explanations of racial inequality, the 'provisional truth' of Rushton and Jensen's (2005) hereditarian hypothesis thereby undermines the moral legitimacy of all rationales for racial equalization that posit White misbehavior as its cause.”

    From What if the hereditarian hypothesis is true? (2005) · cites this paper as Rushton & Jensen, 2005

  • The major facts from Rushton and Jensen's Sections 3-6 and 10-12 have been replicated many times with independent data and are consistent with hereditarian theory but contradict culture-only theory.

    “The following major facts from Rushton and Jensen's (2005) Sections 3-6 and 10-12 have been replicated many times, and all with independent sources of data. All are consistent with hereditarian theory but contradict culture-only theory:”

    From What if the hereditarian hypothesis is true? (2005) · cites this paper as Rushton & Jensen, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Bressler, 1968, Sociobiology, biology and ideology., 178
  2. Chakraborty, 1992, Caucasian genes in American Blacks., American Journal of Human Genetics, 50, 145
  3. Chisholm, 1999, Death, hope, and sex: Steps to an evolutionary ecology of mind and morality., 10.1017/CBO9780511605932 · DOI
  4. Crow, 2002, Unequal by nature: A geneticist's perspective on human differences., Daedalus, 131, 81
  5. Darwin, 1859, The origin of species.
  6. Darwin, 1871, The descent of man.
  7. Eyferth, 1961, Leistungen verscheidener Gruppen von Besatzungskindern in Ham-burg-Wechsler Intelligenztest fur Kinder (HAWIK), Archiv fur die Gesamte Psychologie, 113, 222
  8. Eyferth, 1960, Farbige kinder in Deutschland
  9. Eysenck, 1971, The IQ argument.
  10. 10.2307/1128866 · DOI
  11. Gallon, 1869, Hereditary genius.
  12. Gollfredson, 2000, Pretending lhal intelligence doesn'l mailer., Cerebrum, 2, 75
  13. Ho, 1980, Analysis of brain weight: I and II., Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 104, 635
  14. 10.1037/0012-1649.13.3.184 · DOI
  15. 10.1037/1076-8971.6.1.121 · DOI
  16. Masters, 1997, Brain biochemistry and social status: The neurotoxity hypothesis., 141
  17. Miele, 1995, For whom the bell curve tolls: An interview with [the author of The Bell Curve] Charles Murray, on IQ, race, class, Gould, Gardner, and the Clintons., Skeptic, 3, 34
  18. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.79 · DOI
  19. Nisbett, 1998, Race, genetics, and IQ., 86
  20. Ogbu, 2002, Cultural amplifiers of intelligence: IQ and minority status in cross-cultural perspective., 241
  21. Plomin, 2001, Behavioral genetics
  22. Post, 1982, Populational differences in visual acuity: A review, with speculative notes on selection relaxation., Social Biology, 29, 319
  23. Raven, 1990, Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales-Research supplement: No. 3. American and international norms
  24. 10.1037/0003-066X.49.3.215 · DOI
  25. Simmons, 1942, Cranial capacities by both plastic and water techniques with cranial linear measurements of the Reserve Collection: White and Negro., Human Biology, 14, 473
  26. Skuy, 1987, Effectiveness of the Learning Potential Assessment Device with Indian and Colored adolescents in South Africa., International Journal of Special Education, 12, 131
  27. Stringer, 1996, African exodus.
  28. Watson, 1924, Behaviorism.
  29. Zindi, 1994, Differences in performance., The Psychologist, 7, 549

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
Published
2005-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
235-294
ISSN
  • 1076-8971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1528
OpenAlex
W2110295154
Cited by
457
References
255
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 35
FWCI
33.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology Public Policy and Law (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
heritability of intelligence, transracial adoption, racial mixing, brain size and intelligence, general intelligence, human origins, nature versus nurture, discrimination model, distributional models, public policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review