The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infanticide among animals: A review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00038.x · Cited by 1,263
Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment.
Geary, D. C. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.55 · Cited by 835
Behavioral adaptations to pathogens and parasites: Five strategies
Hart, B. L. (1990) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(05)80038-7 · Cited by 734
Evolution of Primate Social Systems
Kappeler, P. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (2002) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1023/a:1015520830318 · Cited by 733
Metabolic fuels and reproduction in female mammals
Wade, G. N., & Schneider, J. E. (1992) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(05)80183-6 · Cited by 686
Metadata
- Authors
- Hrdy, S. B.
- Venue
- Ethology and Sociobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1979-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-40
- ISSN
- 0162-3095 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000458692
- Cited by
- 1,321
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infanticide among animals: A review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0162-3095(79)90004-9
- The paper
- Hrdy, S. B. (1979). Infanticide among animals: A review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females. Ethology and Sociobiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(79)90004-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
