CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 60Phonetics and Phonology ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersMultisensory perception and integration

Amodal representation of speech in infants

Walton, Gail E., Bower, T.G.R.·1993·Infant Behavior and Development
DOI 10.1016/0163-6383(93)80019-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0163-6383(93)80019-5

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infants' polymodal speech representations likely contain information regarding visual, as well as auditory, instantiations of speech.

    “Infants' polymodal speech representations are thus likely to contain information regarding visual, as well as auditory instantiations of speech (ref. 98, see also refs. 99–101).”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [101]

  • Infants ranging in age from 1 to 14 months perform more sucks to audiovisually compatible than to audiovisually incompatible vowels.

    “This study showed that infants ranging in age from 1 to 14 months perform more sucks to audiovisually compatible than to audiovisually incompatible vowels.”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Walton & Bower, 1993

  • Although the infant results on their own do not provide unequivocal support for an extraexperiential basis, they add to the evidence for linguistic universality, haptic influences, and early sensitivity to audiovisual speech correspondence.

    “To summarize, although our infant results on their own do not provide unequivocal support for an extraexperiential basis, they do add to the evidence for linguistic universality (Massaro et al., 1993), haptic influences (Fowler & Dekle, 1991), and early sensitivity to audiovisual speech correspondence (see, e.g., Walton & Bower, 1993) toward these ends.”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Walton & Bower, 1993

  • There is evidence that very little if any experience is needed in order to detect correspondences and that specialized mechanisms might be involved.

    “Thus, there is evidence that very little-ifany-experience is needed in order to detect correspondences and that specialized mechanisms might be involved.”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Walton & Bower, 1993

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Walton, G. E., & Bower, T. G. R.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Corresponding author
Walton, Gail E.
Venue
Infant Behavior and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-04
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
233-243
ISSN
0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0163-6383(93)80019-5
OpenAlex
W1988737804
Cited by
60
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Infant Behavior and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
speech perception, infants, phoneme perception, audiovisual integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review