CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 310Multisensory perception and integrationLanguage Development and DisordersPhonetics and Phonology Research

The Intermodal Representation of Speech in Infants

Kuhl, Patricia K., Meltzoff, Andrew N.·1984·Infant Behavior and Development
DOI 10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80050-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80050-8

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prior gaze-preference results were likely based on a matching of the spectral information contained in the auditory component.

    “The authors suggest rather that the prior results were likely based on a matching of the spectral information contained in the auditory component.”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Kuhl & Meltzoff, 1984

  • Infants show no match preference if the auditory component comprises simple sine waves or sine wave complexes.

    “Kuhl, Meltzoff, and their colleagues have also found that infants show no match preference ifthe auditory component comprises simple sine waves or sine wave complexes”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Kuhl & Meltzoff, 1984

  • Audiovisual information can be matched to amodal representations by an identity match or by a supramodal representation that mediates nonidentical auditory and visual information.

    “Kuhl and Meltzoff(l984) have proposed two possible processes by which audiovisual information can be matched to amodal representations.”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Kuhl & Meltzoff, 1984

  • The integration results support Kuhl and Meltzoff's (1984) thesis that speech is represented to infants amodally.

    “More generally, our integration results support Kuhl and Meltzoff's (1984) thesis that speech is represented to infants amodally.”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Kuhl and Meltzoff's (1984)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Kuhl, P. K., & Meltzoff, A. N.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Kuhl, Patricia K.
ORCID
Venue
Infant Behavior and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-07
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
361-381
ISSN
0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80050-8
OpenAlex
W2048616781
Cited by
310
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Infant Behavior and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
infants, auditory-visual correspondence, vowel recognition, visual fixation, face recognition (cognition), audiovisual speech integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review