Cited by 96Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Recovery from early cortical damage in rats. I. Differential behavioral and anatomical effects of frontal lesions at different ages of neural maturation

KOLB, B·1987·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Rats with complete removal of the cortex anterior to bregma in adulthood (frontal cortex) were compared behaviorally and neuroanatomically to rats with similar removals at 1, 5, or 10 days of age. The age at which animals received the cortical excision made a significant difference with respect to the development of the thalamus and the remaining cortex as well as the behavioral outcome in adulthood. There was a direct relationship between cortical thickness in adulthood and the age at surgery: the earlier the lesion the thinner the cortex. Part of this anatomical effect was acute, and could be observed within 24 h of surgery, but the major reduction in thickness was not observed until adolescence. Behaviorally, the animals were administered several tests including tongue extension, grooming, beam walking, swimming, and a spatial navigation task. Like the cortical measurements, the behavioral measurements showed a clear relationship between age at surgery and behavioral outcome: the earlier the lesion in infancy, the greater the behavioral impairments. Thus, whereas rats with lesions at 10 days of age showed behavioral sparing, relative to adult operates, on every measure, rats with lesions at 5 days of age performed at about the level of adult operates on most tests and rats with lesions at 1 day had more extensive behavioral impairments than all other groups. These results imply that the effects of cortical injury in infancy are tightly correlated with the precise level of neural maturation at the time of lesion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0166-4328(87)90069-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Age clearly affects prospects for recovery of executive function after focal injury in rat models; rats recover poorly from lesions made in the first week of life, but lesions made during the second week of life often result in full recovery of executive function in adulthood.

    “Age clearly affects prospects for recovery of executive function after focal injury in rat models; rats recover poorly from lesions made in the first week of life, but lesions made during the second week of life—roughly analogous to the first year of life in humans (Kolb and Cioe, 2000)—often results in full recovery of executive function in adulthood”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KOLB, B.
Affiliations
University of Lethbridge (CA)
Corresponding author
KOLB, B
ORCID
KOLB, B
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-09
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
205-220
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122025364
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • LOEWE Zentrum AdRIA
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
frontal cortex lesions, age at surgery, neuronal maturation, cortical thickness, thalamus development, behavioral recovery, behavioral impairment, infancy, adolescence, spatial navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review