The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Breeding innovation clusters through collaborative research networks
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The evidence on science partners shows that they contribute to innovation networks usually through informal-personal networks (Bower and Keogh, 1996) and that their contribution is important in enabling firms to develop thinking that steps outside of their particular business system (Liyanage, 1995).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Liyanage, 1995
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Debresson, 1989, Breeding innovation clusters: a source of dynamic development, World Development, 17, 4, 10.1016/0305-750X(89)90218-0 · DOI
- Law, 1988, Policy and mapping of scientific change: a co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification, Scientometrics, 14, 251, 10.1007/BF02020078 · DOI
- Peters, 1993, Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Parts 1 & 2, Research Policy, 22, 23, 10.1016/0048-7333(93)90031-C · DOI
- Peters, 1993, Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part II: Representations by combined clustering and multidimensional scaling, Research Policy, 22, 47, 10.1016/0048-7333(93)90032-D · DOI
- Callon, 1991, Tools for the evaluation of technological programmes: an account of work done at the Centre for the Sociology of Innovation, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 3, 3, 10.1080/09537329108524030 · DOI
- Liyanage, 1994, A ‘symbiotic’ model of innovation management for collaborative research, Prometheus, 12, 203, 10.1080/08109029408629165 · DOI
- Vanstone, 1993, Create to Compete: Developing New Directions for Australian Industry Policy, Report of the Senator
- National Critical Technologies Panel, 1991, Report of the National Critical Technologies Panel
- Alic, 1990, Cooperation in R&D, Technovation, 10, 10.1016/0166-4972(90)90016-D · DOI
- National Critical Technologies Panel, 1993, Report of the National Critical Technologies Panel
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747
Metadata
- Authors
- Liyanage, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Liyanage, Shantha
- ORCID
- Liyanage, Shantha
- Venue
- Technovation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 553-567
- ISSN
- 0166-4972 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998776915
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Technovation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Keywords
- innovation clusters, research collaboration networks, national innovation system, Cooperative Research Centres, research collaboration, technology clusters, knowledge diffusion, science policy, cluster formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
