CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40Pain Management and Placebo EffectNeural dynamics and brain functionEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EEG spectral analysis during hypnotic induction, hypnotic dream and age regression

De Pascalis, Vilfredo·1993·International Journal of Psychophysiology
DOI 10.1016/0167-8760(93)90073-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

EEG was recorded monopolarly at frontal (F3, F4), central (C3, C4) and posterior (in the middle of O1-P3-T5 and O2-P4-T6 triangles) derivations during the hypnotic induction of the Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale (SHCS) and during performance following suggestions of hypnotic dream and age-regression as expressed in the before-mentioned scale. 10 low-hypnotizable and 9 highly-hypnotizable and right-handed female students participated in one experimental session. Evaluations were Fast-Fourier spectral analyses during the following conditions: waking-rest in eyes-open and eyes-closed condition; early, middle, and late phases of hypnotic induction; rest-hypnosis in eyes closed condition; hypnotic dream and age regression. After spectral analysis of 0 to 44 Hz, the mean spectral amplitude estimates across seven Hz bands (theta 1, 4-6 Hz, theta 2, 6-8 Hz; alpha 1, 8-10 Hz; alpha 2, 10-13 Hz; beta 1, 13-16 Hz; beta 2, 16-20 Hz; beta 3, 20-36 Hz) and the 40-Hz EEG band (36-44 Hz) for each experimental condition were extracted. In eyes-open and -closed conditions in waking and hypnosis highly-hypnotizable subjects produced a greater 40-Hz EEG amplitude than did low hypnotizable subjects at all frontal, central and posterior locations. In the early and middle hypnotic induction highly-hypnotizables displayed a greater amount of beta 3 than did low hypnotizables and this difference was even more pronounced in the left hemisphere. With posterior scalp recordings, during hypnotic dream…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0167-8760(93)90073-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Arezzo, 1980, Intracortical sources and surface topography of the motor potential and somatosensory evoked potential in monkey, Prog. Brain Res., 54, 77, 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61610-6 · DOI
  2. Bauer, 1980, Autonomic and central nervous system responding: During hypnosis and simulation of hypnosis, Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn., 28, 148, 10.1080/00207148008409837 · DOI
  3. Bowers, 1971, Sex and susceptibility as moderator variables in the relationship of creativity and hypnotic susceptibility, J. Abnorm. Psychol., 78, 93, 10.1037/h0031327 · DOI
  4. Chen, 1981, Cortical power spectrum analysis of hypnotic pain control in surgery, Int. J. Neurosci., 13, 127, 10.3109/00207458109043312 · DOI
  5. Coppola, 1986, Subjects with low versus high frequency alpha rhythm reveal different topographic structure, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 63, 41
  6. De Benedittis, 1986, Depth cerebral electrical activity in man during hypnosis: A brief communication, Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn., 2, 63, 10.1080/00207148608406972 · DOI
  7. De Pascalis, 1989, 40-HZ EEG asymmetry during recall of emotional events in waking and hypnosis: differences between low and high hypnotizables, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 7, 85, 10.1016/0167-8760(89)90034-2 · DOI
  8. De Pascalis, 1984, Personality, hypnotic susceptibility and EEG responses: preliminary study, Percept. Motor Skills, 59, 371, 10.2466/pms.1984.59.2.371 · DOI
  9. De Pascalis, 1990, 40-Hz EEG activity during hypnotic induction and hypnotic testing, Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn., 2, 125, 10.1080/00207149008414507 · DOI
  10. De Pascalis, 1986, EEG alpha asymmetry. Task difficulty and hypnotizability, Percept. Motor Skills, 62, 139, 10.2466/pms.1986.62.1.139 · DOI
  11. De Pascalis, 1987, Hemispheric activity of 40 Hz EEG during recall of emotional events: Differences between low and high hypnotizables, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 5, 167, 10.1016/0167-8760(87)90003-1 · DOI · Paper page
  12. De Pascalis, 1988, EEG asymmetry during covert mental activity and its relationship with hyppotizability, Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn., 36, 38, 10.1080/00207148808409326 · DOI
  13. Engstrom, 1970, Hypnotic susceptibility increased by EEG alpha training, Nature, 227, 1261, 10.1038/2271261a0 · DOI
  14. Glass, 1968, Intensity of attenuation of alpha activity by mental arithmetic in females and males, Physiol. Behav., 3, 217, 10.1016/0031-9384(68)90088-7 · DOI
  15. Glass, 1984, Hemispheric asymmetry of EEG alpha activation: effects of gender and familiar handedens, Biol. Psychol., 19, 169, 10.1016/0301-0511(84)90035-8 · DOI
  16. Gruzelier, 1984, Hypnotic susceptibility: A lateral predisposition and altered cerebral asymmetry under hypnosis, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2, 131, 10.1016/0167-8760(84)90006-0 · DOI
  17. Gur, 1974, Handedness, sex and eyedness as moderating variables in the relation between hypnotic susceptibility and functional brain asymmetry, J. Abnorm. Psychol., 83, 635, 10.1037/h0037353 · DOI
  18. Jennings, 1987, Editorial policy on analyses of variance with repeated measures, Psychophysiology, 24, 474, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00320.x · DOI
  19. Morgan, 1978, The Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale for Adults, Am. J. Clin. Hypn., 21, 134, 10.1080/00029157.1978.10403968 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Morgan, 1974, EEG alpha: Lateral asymmetry related to task and hypnotizability, Psychophysiology, 11, 275, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1974.tb00544.x · DOI
  21. Ray, 1976, Sex differences and lateral specialization of hemispheric functioning, Neuropsychologia, 14, 391, 10.1016/0028-3932(76)90035-X · DOI
  22. Sabourin, 1982, Hypnosis and brain function: EEG correlates of state-trait differences, res. Commun. Psychol. Psychiatr. Behav., 7, 149
  23. Sabourin, 1990, EEG correlates of Hypnotic Susceptibility and Hypnotic Trance: Spectral Analysis and Coherence, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 10, 125, 10.1016/0167-8760(90)90027-B · DOI
  24. Salmaso, 1985, Problems in the assessment of hand preference, Cortex, 21, 533, 10.1016/S0010-9452(58)80003-9 · DOI
  25. Tebecis, 1975, Hypnosis and the EEG: a quantitative investigation, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 161, 1, 10.1097/00005053-197507000-00001 · DOI
  26. Tellegen, 1974, Openness to absorbing and self-alerting experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility, J. Abnorm. Psychol., 83, 268, 10.1037/h0036681 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Trotman, 1979, Sex differences in task-dependent EEG asymmetries, Psychophysiology, 16, 429, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01497.x · DOI
  28. Ulett, 1972, Hypnosis: physiological, pharmacological reality, Am. J. Psychiatr., 128, 799, 10.1176/ajp.128.7.799 · DOI
  29. Vasey, 1987, The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: A multivariate solution, Psychophysiology, 24, 479, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00324.x · DOI
  30. Vogel, 1968, EEG and mental abilities, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 24, 166, 10.1016/0013-4694(68)90122-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 40

Metadata

Authors
De Pascalis, V.
Venue
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-09
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
153-166
ISSN
0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0167-8760(93)90073-x
OpenAlex
W2113855959
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
age regression, hypnotic susceptibility, EEG spectral power, beta band, alpha band, theta band, hemispheric lateralization, hypnagogic state, hypnagogic sleep
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Hypnosis, Imagination, Functional Laterality, Ovum, Psychological Tests, Suggestion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review