The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature*
Vessey, I. (1991) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00344.x · Cited by 1,263
Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition
Vessey, I., & Galletta, D. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.1.63 · Cited by 705
Cited by
Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice
Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.00407 · Cited by 6,416
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context
Moon, J.-W., & Kim, Y.-G. (2001) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(00)00061-6 · Cited by 3,802
Service quality delivery through web sites: a critical review of extant knowledge
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2002) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/009207002236911 · Cited by 2,729
The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01250 · Cited by 2,572
Metadata
- Authors
- Keil, M., Beranek, P. M., & Konsynski, B. R.
- Venue
- Decision Support Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-91
- ISSN
- 0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043837795
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 29.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0167-9236(94)e0032-m
- The paper
- Keil, M., Beranek, P. M., & Konsynski, B. R. (1995). Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)e0032-m
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
