The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improvement of heavy metal biosorption by mycelial dead biomasses (Rhizopus arrhizus, Mucor miehei and Penicillium chrysogenum): pH control and cationic activation
Open accessAbstract
Fungal mycelial by-products from fermentation industries present a considerable affinity for soluble metal ions (e.g. Zn, Cd, Ni, Pb, Cr, Ag) and could be used in biosorption processes for purification of contaminated effluents. In this work the influence of pH on sorption parameters is characterized by measuring the isotherms of five heavy metals (Ni, Zn, Cd, Ag and Pb) with Rhizopus arrhizus biomass under pH-controlled conditions. The maximum sorption capacity for lead was observed at pH 7.0 (200 mg g-1), while silver uptake was weakly affected. The stability of metal-biosorbent complexes is regularly enhanced by pH neutralization, except for lead. A transition in sorption mechanism was observed above pH 6.0. In addition, comparison of various industrial fungal biomasses (R. arrhizus, Mucor miehei and Penicillium chrysogenum) indicated important variations in zinc-binding and buffering properties (0.24, 0.08 and 0.05 mmol g-1, respectively). Without control, the equilibrium pH (5.8, 3.9 and 4.0) is shown to be related to the initial calcium content of the biosorbent. pH neutralization during metal adsorption increases zinc sorption in all fungi (0.57, 0.52 and 0.33 mmol g-1) but an improvement was also obtained (0.34, 0.33 and 0.10 mmol g-1) by calcium saturation of the biomass before heavy metal accumulation. Breakthrough curves of fixed bed biosorbent columns demonstrated the capacity of the biosorbent process to purify zinc and lead solutions in continuous-flow systems, and confirmed the necessity for cationic activation of the biosorbent before contact with the heavy-metal solution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater
Ahluwalia, S. S., & Goyal, D. (2007) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.006 · Cited by 1,586
Gadd, G. M. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.1999 · Cited by 1,287
Heavy metal removal in a biosorption column by immobilized M. rouxii biomass
Yan, G., & Viraraghavan, T. (2001) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(01)00020-7 · Cited by 448
Removal of toxic chromium from wastewater using green alga Ulva lactuca and its activated carbon
El-Sikaily, A., Nemr, A. E., Khaled, A., & Abdelwehab, O. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.146 · Cited by 386
Mona, S., & Kaushik, A. (2015) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.037 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Fourest, E.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 325-332
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081431316
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improvement of heavy metal biosorption by mycelial dead biomasses (Rhizopus arrhizus, Mucor miehei and Penicillium chrysogenum): pH control and cationic activation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0168-6445(94)90050-7
- The paper
- Fourest, E. (1994). Improvement of heavy metal biosorption by mycelial dead biomasses (Rhizopus arrhizus, Mucor miehei and Penicillium chrysogenum): pH control and cationic activation. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-6445(94)90050-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.