Cited by 15Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

The influence of moisture on the suppression of Pseudomonas syringae by Aureobasidium pullulans on an artificial leaf surface

Open access
McCormack, P., Wildman, H.G., Jeffries, P.·1995·FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Abstract

Isolates of Aureobasidium pullulans which produce antibacterial metabolites were compared with non-antibiotic-producing isolates of Tremella foliacea and Trichosporon beigelii for their ability to inhibit growth of Pseudomonas syringae pv phaseolicola. The bacteria and fungi were co-inoculated on an artificial leaf surface under conditions of low and high water availability. Under conditions of excess moisture, antibiotic production gave no advantage to the Aureobasidium isolates, and all the yeasts were equally antagonistic. Under drier conditions the Aureobasidium isolates reduced the population of P. syringae by 96–99%, a result which was significantly different from that which occurred when the bacteria were co-inoculated with the other yeasts under these conditions. An antibacterial compound, similar to that produced in liquid culture by Aureobasidium, was detected in washings from the artificial leaf surface following growth of this species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1995.tb00279.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Toxin production provided a competitive advantage to A. pullulans under dry, oligotrophic conditions, whereas it had no effect on antagonistic activity in more humid environments.

    “Toxin production provided a competitive advantage to A. pullulans under dry, oligotrophic conditions, whereas it had no effect (as compared to yeasts not producing toxins) on antagonistic activity in more humid environments (McCormack et al. 1995).”

    From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as McCormack et al. 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCormack, P., Wildman, H. G., & Jeffries, P.
Affiliations
University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Jeffries, P.
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
Published
1995-02
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
159-166
ISSN
  • 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-6941
OpenAlex
W1972341418
Cited by
15
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEMS Microbiology Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Aureobasidium pullulans, Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola, biological control, moisture availability, antibacterial metabolites, antagonism, Trichosporon beigelii, co-inoculation, plant pathogenic bacteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review