Cited by 74Cultural Differences and ValuesPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Personality variation and values endorsement in Chinese University students

Luk, Chung Leung, Bond, Michael Harris·1993·Personality and Individual Differences

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90312-q

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Luk and Bond (1993) successfully predicted personal values from scale scores on a Chinese translation of the NEO-PI-R; similar predictions have been successful in Western cultures.

    “Luk and Bond (1993) successfully predicted personal values from scale scores on a Chinese translation of the NEO-PI-R; similar predictions have been successful in Western cultures.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bond, 1988, finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese Value Surveys, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 1009, 10.1037/0022-3514.55.6.1009 · DOI
  2. Bond, 1984, Linking person perception to behavior intention across cultures: The role of cultural collectivism, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 337, 10.1177/0022002184015003006 · DOI
  3. Costa, 1991, Facet scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory, Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 887, 10.1016/0191-8869(91)90177-D · DOI
  4. Digman, 1990, Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model, Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417, 10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221 · DOI
  5. Furnham, 1984, Personality and values, Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 483, 10.1016/0191-8869(84)90018-7 · DOI
  6. McCrae, 1982, Consensual validation of personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and ratings, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 293, 10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.293 · DOI
  7. McCrae, 1987, Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81, 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · DOI · Paper page
  8. McCrae, 1989, The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggin's circumplex and the five-factor model, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586, 10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.586 · DOI
  9. Norman, 1963, Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574, 10.1037/h0040291 · DOI
  10. Rim, 1970, Values and attitudes, Personality, 1, 243
  11. Rim, 1971, Valeurs et personalite, Revue Suisse Psychologie Appliquee, 30, 93
  12. Schwartz, 1992, Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries, Vol. 25, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Luk, C. L., & Bond, M. H.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Bond, Michael Harris
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-03
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
429-437
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026141749
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
personality traits, Big Five personality traits, agreeableness, Schwartz value theory, value domains, university students, Chinese students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review