Cited by 127Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Blinding during data analysis and writing of manuscripts

Gøtzsche, Peter C.·1996·Controlled Clinical Trials

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00263-4

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gøtzsche, P. C.
Affiliations
Rigshospitalet (DK)
Corresponding author
Gøtzsche, Peter C.
Venue
Controlled Clinical Trials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-08
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
285-290
ISSN
0197-2456 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093318388
Cited by
123
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Controlled Clinical Trials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
dogs, veterinary examination, animal stress, heart rate variability, heart rate, tympanic temperature
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, Double-Blind Method, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Research Design, Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review