CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 177Dietary Effects on HealthGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of life-long food restriction on spatial memory in young and aged Fischer 344 rats measured in the eight-arm radial and the Morris water mazes

STEWART, J, MITCHELL, J, KALANT, N·1989·Neurobiology of Aging
DOI 10.1016/0197-4580(89)90003-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The effect of life-long 60% ad lib food restriction on performance in two tasks involving spatial memory, the eight-arm radial maze and the Morris water maze, was studied in young and aged Fischer 344 rats. Restricted (R) and ad lib (AL) feeding groups were compared at 8, 16, and 24 months of age on both tasks. A 30-month-old R group was also tested in the Morris water maze. In the eight-arm maze, although 24-month-old animals performed more poorly than 8- and 16-month-old animals during the first week of testing, overall accuracy of performance did not vary significantly as a function of age. Twenty-four-month-old animals took longer to make 10 choices than did younger animals, and there was a significant interaction between feeding regimen and age, reflecting the fact that at the two younger ages, R groups performed more quickly than the AL groups. In the Morris water maze, both distance swum and time to find the platform increased with age. Life-long food restriction led to small but significant improvements in performance in the water maze in aged rats. R groups showed evidence for better retention over 24-hour intervals than did AL groups. By 30 months of age, however, R animals showed impaired performance relative to younger R groups. These differential findings on the two tasks, as they were used here, suggest that there was greater impairment with age on the spatial memory task requiring retention of information over long intervals than there was on the task primarily involving working memory within a trial.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0197-4580(89)90003-1

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 177

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
STEWART, J., MITCHELL, J., & KALANT, N.
Affiliations
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-11
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
669-675
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0197-4580(89)90003-1
OpenAlex
W2120690437
Cited by
177
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
dietary restriction, spatial memory, aging, eight-arm radial maze, Morris water maze, working memory, long-term retention, age-related cognitive decline, F344 rats, ad libitum feeding
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Food Deprivation, Male, Memory, Rats, Inbred F344, Spatial Behavior, Task Performance and Analysis, Time Factors, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review