The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment with emphasis on roots and the rhizosphere
Open accessAbstract
Empirical records provide incontestable evidence of global changes: foremost among these changes is the rising concentration of CO(2) in the earth's atmosphere. Plant growth is nearly always stimulated by elevation of CO(2). Photosynthesis increases, more plant biomass accumulates per unit of water consumed, and economic yield is enhanced. The profitable use of supplemental CO(2) over years of greenhouse practice points to the value of CO(2) for plant production. Plant responses to CO(2) are known to interact with other environmental factors, e.g. light, temperature, soil water, and humidity. Important stresses including drought, temperature, salinity, and air pollution have been shown to be ameliorated when CO(2) levels are elevated. In the agricultural context, the growing season has been shortened for some crops with the application of more CO(2); less water use has generally, but not always, been observed and is under further study; experimental studies have shown that economic yield for most crops increases by about 33% for a doubling of ambient CO(2) concentration. However, there are some reports of negligible or negative effects. Plant species respond differently to CO(2) enrichment, therefore, clearly competitive shifts within natural communities could occur. Though of less importance in managed agro-ecosystems, competition between crops and weeds could also be altered. Tissue composition can vary as CO(2) increases (e.g. higher C: N ratios) leading to changes in herbivory, but tests of crop products (consumed by man) from elevated CO(2) experiments have generally not revealed significant differences in their quality. However, any CO(2)-induced change in plant chemical or structural make-up could lead to alterations in the plant's interaction with any number of environmental factors-physicochemical or biological. Host-pathogen relationships, defense against physical stressors, and the capacity to overcome resource shortages could be impacted by rises in CO(2). Root biomass is known to increase but, with few exceptions, detailed studies of root growth and function are lacking. Potential enhancement of root growth could translate into greater rhizodeposition, which, in turn, could lead to shifts in the rhizosphere itself. Some of the direct effects of CO(2) on vegetation have been reasonably well-studied, but for others work has been inadequate. Among these neglected areas are plant roots and the rhizosphere. Therefore, experiments on root and rhizosphere response in plants grown in CO(2)-enriched atmospheres will be reviewed and, where possible, collectively integrated. To this will be added data which have recently been collected by us. Having looked at the available data base, we will offer a series of hypotheses which we consider as priority targets for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co 2 Budget
Tans, P. P., Fung, I. Y., & Takahashi, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4949.1431 · Cited by 2,066
Seasonal amplitude increase in atmospheric CO 2 concentration at Mauna Loa, Hawaii, 1959–1982
Bacastow, R. B., Keeling, C. D., & Whorf, T. P. (1985) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/jd090id06p10529 · Cited by 250 · cited 1×
“The recurring saw-toothed pattern is thought to reflect the seasonal cycle of the growth of vegetation in the Northern Hemisphere (Bacastow et al., 1985).”
BackgroundAnalysis of Effects of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Ozone on Cotton Yield Trends
Reddy, V. R., Baker, D. N., & McKinion, J. M. (1989) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq1989.00472425001800040005x · Cited by 21
Cited by
Ecological Lessons from Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) Experiments
Norby, R. J., & Zak, D. R. (2011) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144647 · Cited by 681
Elevated CO2and plant structure: a review
Pritchard, S. G., Rogers, H. H., Prior, S. A., & Peterson, C. M. (1999) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00268.x · Cited by 462
Self-citationRhizosphere effect on nutrient availability in soil and its uptake by plants: a review
Dotaniya, M. L., & Meena, V. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40011-013-0297-0 · Cited by 298
Prior, S. A., Runion, G. B., Marble, S. C., Rogers, H. H., Gilliam, C. H., & Torbert, H. A. (2011) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.46.2.158 · Cited by 117
Self-citationClimate change, air pollution, pollen allergy and extreme atmospheric events
D’Amato, G., & D’Amato, M. (2023) · Current Opinion in Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/mop.0000000000001237 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogers, H. H., Runion, G. B., & Krupa, S. V.
- Venue
- Environmental Pollution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 155-189
- ISSN
- 0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161888917
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 61.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment with emphasis on roots and the rhizosphere. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0269-7491(94)90034-5
- The paper
- Rogers, H. H., Runion, G. B., & Krupa, S. V. (1994). Plant responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment with emphasis on roots and the rhizosphere. Environmental Pollution. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(94)90034-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.