The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The number of Level 1 criteria (n = 6) remained within Saaty's [23] recommended range (7 ± 2) for cognitively tractable pairwise comparison.”
From Toward Sustainable AI Literacy in Higher Education: A Delphi–AHP Approach to Identifying Key Components of AI/Data Extracurricular Programs (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The resulting six-criterion structure remained within Saaty's [23] recommended range (7 ± 2), allowing cognitively tractable pairwise comparison while preserving full domain coverage.”
From Toward Sustainable AI Literacy in Higher Education: A Delphi–AHP Approach to Identifying Key Components of AI/Data Extracurricular Programs (2026) · cites this paper as Saaty's [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), developed by Saaty [23], is a multi-criteria decision-making technique that decomposes complex problems into hierarchical structures of goal, criteria, and alternatives, and then quantifies relative importance through pairwise comparisons.”
From Toward Sustainable AI Literacy in Higher Education: A Delphi–AHP Approach to Identifying Key Components of AI/Data Extracurricular Programs (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“AHP enables the conversion of qualitative expert judgments into numerical weights, with built-in consistency verification through the Consistency Ratio (CR).”
From Toward Sustainable AI Literacy in Higher Education: A Delphi–AHP Approach to Identifying Key Components of AI/Data Extracurricular Programs (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The consistency ratio of 0.015 confirms acceptable logical consistency well within Saaty's [23] threshold of 0.10.”
From Toward Sustainable AI Literacy in Higher Education: A Delphi–AHP Approach to Identifying Key Components of AI/Data Extracurricular Programs (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“One of the most commonly used multi-criteria decision-making methods is the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is used to determine criteria weights and rank alternatives based on expert judgment [41].”
From An Integrated AHP–Fuzzy AHP Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models in Software Engineering Education (2026) · cites this paper as [41]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Saaty, 1982, Decision Making for Leaders
- Saaty, 1986, Absolute and relative measurement with the AHP. The most livable cities in the United States, Socio-econ. Plann. Sci., 20, 327, 10.1016/0038-0121(86)90043-1 · DOI
- Saaty, 1987, Stimulus—response with reciprocal kernels: the rise and fall of sensation, J. math. Sci.
- Aczél, 1983, Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements, J. math. Psychol., 27, 93, 10.1016/0022-2496(83)90028-7 · DOI
- Hämäläinen, 1986, The analytic network process in energy policy planning, Socio-econ. Plann. Sci., 20, 399, 10.1016/0038-0121(86)90054-6 · DOI
- Harker, 1987, Alternative modes of questioning in the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Mathl Modelling, 9, 353, 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90492-1 · DOI
- Saaty, 1984, Inconsistency and rank preservation, J. math. Psychol., 28, 205, 10.1016/0022-2496(84)90027-0 · DOI
- Saaty, 1986, Axiomatic foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Mgmt Sci., 32, 841, 10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841 · DOI
- Saaty, 1987, Rank generation, preservation and reversal in the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Decis. Sci., 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1987.tb01514.x · DOI
- Aczél, 1987, Synthesizing judgements: a functional equations approach, Mathl Modelling, 9, 311, 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90487-8 · DOI
- Vargas, 1982, Reciprocal matrices with random coefficients, J. math. Modelling, 3, 69, 10.1016/0270-0255(82)90013-6 · DOI
- Zahedi, 1986, The Analytic Hierarchy Process—a survey of the method and its applications, Interfaces, 16, 96, 10.1287/inte.16.4.96 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,013
An efficient technique for hazard susceptibility mapping using AHP- and ML-based models
Aswal, S., Banolia, C., & Deshpande, S. (2024) · Environmental Remote Sensing · doi:10.1117/12.3031770 · Cited by 3
Vassilakis, E., Konsolaki, A., Soukis, K., Laskari, S., Kotsi, E., Lialiaris, J., & Lekkas, E. (2024) · Land · doi:10.3390/land13111873 · Cited by 3
Mambretti, S. (2024) · WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development · doi:10.37394/232015.2024.20.54 · Cited by 3
Nugraheni, S. N., Raharjo, T., & Trisnawaty, N. W. (2024) · Computer Science and Information Technologies · doi:10.11591/csit.v5i3.p272-282 · Cited by 3
Ahmed, S. A. S. (2024) · serdec educational journal · doi:10.70595/sej83 · Cited by 3
Atik, M., & Safi, O. (2024) · International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics · doi:10.30897/ijegeo.1457292 · Cited by 3
Zhang, Q., Huang, H., Xu, H., Li, Z., Tian, X., Fang, S., Wang, J., Xie, C., & Yang, D.-D. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16187906 · Cited by 3
“…a weighted decision analysis method proposed by Saaty, a professor at the Pittsburgh and an American operations researcher, in the early 1970s [38,39 The AHP is as follows [40,41]: ]. as follows [40,41 (1) Hierarchical analytical modeling (1) Hierarchical analytical The results of the risk…”
Sathurshan, M., Thamboo, J., Rossetto, T., Wijesundara, K., Mallikarachchi, C., Cels, J., Baiguera, M., Zoppo, M. D., & Dias, P. (2024) · Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10518-024-02010-y · Cited by 3
“A CR value less than 10% indicates that the pairwise comparison is consistent across the criteria considered (Saaty 1987).”
Ramos, B., Silva, J., Vila-Chã, A., Azevedo, H. A., Ramos, J., & Ferreira, A. (2024) · Business Systems Research Journal · doi:10.2478/bsrj-2024-0009 · Cited by 3
“The 𝑅𝐶𝐼 was defined by Saaty, (1987).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTata kelola lingkungan berkelanjutan sebagai implementasi kebijakan pertahanan negara
Muslikhatin, L. (2024) · Journal of Critical Ecology · doi:10.61511/jcreco.v1i2.1329 · Cited by 3
“Pengambilan keputusan dalam mengambil pilihan terbaik dari alternatif ini akan diolah menggunakan metode analytical hierarchy process ( AHP ) dengan mempertimbangkan hasil diskusi bersama para ahli lingkungan dan tata kelola perkotaan melalui focus group discussion ( FGD ) (Saaty, 1987) .”
Towards a taxonomy for Business-to-Government data sharing
Signorelli, S., Fontana, M., Vespe, M., Gabrielli, L., & Bertoni, E. (2024) · Statistical Journal of the IAOS · doi:10.3233/sji-230122 · Cited by 3
“Moreover, specific quantitative techniques could be ap-S plied to determine the best way to rank the identified attributes, like the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) [17,18].”
Mohammadpour, M., Afrasiabi, A., & Yazdani, M. (2024) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-11-2023-0602 · Cited by 3
Li, Z., Li, C., Cao, Y.-H., & Yong, X.-Y. (2024) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-024-09975-w · Cited by 3
“Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been used in decision-making and operations research since its introduction by Saaty [21].”
Andreotti, A., Pasquale, A. D., Meo, S., Pagano, M., & Toscano, L. (2024) · International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion · doi:10.1109/speedam61530.2024.10609215 · Cited by 3
“In this context, a possible solution is represented by the AHP [15], which is a decision-making methodology used to establish priorities in various scenarios.”
MethodPereira, J. A., Marcia, V. J., dos Anjos, J. M. M., Nunes, A. D. A., Carvalho, C. O., & da Silva, T. V. (2024) · Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental · doi:10.24857/rgsa.v18n4-132 · Cited by 3
“The IR is determined according to the number of indicators used in the AHP method, where according to Saaty (1987), for order matrix 4, the value of 0.90 is assumed.”
MethodInfluentialPandey, D., & Singh, K. K. (2024) · World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2024 · doi:10.1061/9780784485477.058 · Cited by 3
Performance analysis of weighting methods for handover decision in HetNets
Riaz, H., Öztürk, S., Çolak, S. A., & Çalhan, A. (2024) · GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE · doi:10.35378/gujs.1373452 · Cited by 3
van Remmen, J. S., Horber, D., Händel, J., Miehling, J., & Wartzack, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the Design Society · doi:10.1017/pds.2024.249 · Cited by 3
“The aim of this paper is to apply the MCDM methods to the present use case of user-centred product development, namely AHP by Saaty (1987) in section 4.1 and PROMETHEE by Brans et al. (1986) in section 4.2.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDíaz-Espíritu, N., Expósito-Castillo, J. L., Esteller-Alberich, M. V., & Gómez-Albores, M. (2024) · Environmental Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12665-024-11602-5 · Cited by 3
“Finally, to construct the comparison matrix, Table 1 was used by considering the direct or inverse relationships between the five factors (Saaty 1987; Saaty and Vargas 2012).”
InfluentialEsponda-Bernal, M. D. M., Echeverri-Sánchez, A. F., Aguirre-Gonzalez, E. F., & Andrade, R. (2024) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2024.103909 · Cited by 3
Risk Assessment for Recreational Activities in the Coastal Ocean
Chuang, H.-C., Doong, D., Ho, C.-R., & Ho, Y.-H. (2024) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse12040604 · Cited by 3
Paoletti, M., Piscopo, V., Sbarbati, C., & Scarelli, A. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16072804 · Cited by 3
Controlling aeroplane crashing through aviation infrastructure using multi-agent technology
Thakur, S., Sharma, S., Parti, R., & Singh, V. (2024) · International Journal of Crashworthiness · doi:10.1080/13588265.2024.2328913 · Cited by 3
“Consistency should be within the predefined value i.e. consistency ratio (CR), which should be less than 0.1, otherwise data collection process and computation performed should be repeated until the CR value reaches less than 0.1 [33].”
InfluentialJebraoui, S., Nemiche, M., & Hafidi, B. (2024) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.3004 · Cited by 3
Optimizing Mini Dam Placement for Sustainable Water Management in FUTA: A GIS-MCDA Approach
Tata, H., Lateef, L., & Nzelibe, I. (2024) · Turkish Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS · doi:10.48123/rsgis.1366317 · Cited by 3
“1 represents equal importance of two layers and 9 means uppermost importance of a layer over another layer (Saaty, 1987).”
BackgroundKentsel dönüşüm alanlarında akıllı şehir ölçümü: İstanbul Esenler örneği
Mazlum, Z. O., & Ercoşkun, Ö. Y. (2024) · Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.17341/gazimmfd.1146942 · Cited by 3
de Lima, A. M. C., Faccioli, G. G., & Medeiros, F. (2024) · Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental · doi:10.24857/rgsa.v18n4-054 · Cited by 3
Developing a WELL building model for office environments
Tan, C. Y. M., Rahman, R. A., & Lee, Y. S. (2024) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-024-31923-z · Cited by 5
“AHP is a multi-criteria decision technique to compare and prioritize criteria using weighting systems (Saaty 1987; Sudarsanam et al. 2022).”
InfluentialStatisticam approaches for consistency index in analytical hierarchy process
Handayani, A., Farikhin, F., & Surarso, B. (2024) · AKSIOMA · doi:10.26877/aks.v14i3.17114 · Cited by 3
Badran, O., & Jallad, J. (2023) · International journal of electrical and computer engineering systems · doi:10.32985/ijeces.14.10.12 · Cited by 3
“The AHP is an effective and practical approach used to solve multicriteria decision-making problems, and it was introduced by Thomas L. Saaty in [36, 37].”
Determination of flood vulnerability level based on different numbers of indicators using AHP-GIS
Jayantari, M. W., Ramli, S., & Eryani, I. (2023) · Sinergi · doi:10.22441/sinergi.2024.1.002 · Cited by 3
“Members of parliament must first define priorities for their primary criteria by assessing their relative relevance in pairs, resulting in a pairwise comparison matrix [30].”
BackgroundMiranda-Jiménez, R., Vigil-Galán, O., González-Castillo, J., Terán-Cuevas, Á. R., Gutiérrez-Castillo, M. E., & Tovar-Gálvez, L. R. (2023) · Atmósfera · doi:10.20937/atm.53282 · Cited by 3
“(1). where Ss i represents the suitability scores, x i , is the criterion value assigned by Saaty’s criteria score (Saaty, 1987), w i is the weight calculated for each criterion, and n is the number of selected criteria.”
MethodInfluentialPrayogo, B., Yudisaputro, H., & Kurniawan, A. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Conference on Energy Technologies for Future Grids (ETFG) · doi:10.1109/etfg55873.2023.10408519 · Cited by 3
Pradini, D., & Kusumastuti, R. D. (2023) · Quantitative Economics and Management Studies · doi:10.35877/454ri.qems2166 · Cited by 3
“In determining the weight, these experts will give their judgement of each criteria using the AHP Scale developed by Saaty (1987) ranging from 1-9 which represents Equal Importance to Extreme Importance.”
MethodRisk Assessment of Freezing–Thawing Hazards in the Daxing’anling Forest Region
Chen, K., & Huang, S. (2023) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos14121721 · Cited by 4
Thailand’s higher education ESP practitioners: Problems, solutions and a potential practices model
Chaovanapricha, T., & Champakaew, W. (2023) · Asian Journal of Education and Training · doi:10.20448/edu.v9i4.5037 · Cited by 3
Merino-Benítez, T., Hernández, V., & Bojórquez-Tapia, L. (2023) · International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process · doi:10.13033/ijahp.v15i2.1100 · Cited by 3
“During the workshops, the AHP (Saaty, 1980) was implemented through the freeware Super Decisions (CDF, 2023).”
MethodMunn, K., & Dragićević, S. (2023) · Trans. GIS · doi:10.1111/tgis.13101 · Cited by 3
“Once the criteria attribute values were calculated, corresponding criteria weights were determined from the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (Saaty, 1987), and suitability functions were developed based on values obtained from the scientific literature.”
MethodMasudin, I., Wardana, R. W., Wijayanti, M., & Restuputri, D. P. (2023) · ASEAN Engineering Journal · doi:10.11113/aej.v13.19159 · Cited by 3
“Table 2 show fuzzy scale using TFN. Make a geometric mean from a fuzzy comparison matrix (FCM), like the following equation: (6) Where is still in the form of a triangular fuzzy number or with the Saaty equation.”
InfluentialCo-branding drivers between professional sport organizations and on-field sports apparel sponsors
Abdolmaleki, H., Mohammadi, S., Babaei, M., Soheili, B., Dickson, G., & Funk, D. (2023) · International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship · doi:10.1108/ijsms-03-2023-0048 · Cited by 3
Shahamabad, M. A., Rahimi, A., Shamsadini, K., & Hemmatabad, M. S. (2023) · Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal · doi:10.1108/meq-08-2022-0227 · Cited by 4
Implementing AHP Method for Determining Level Priority of Vendor Selection
Wulandari, K., Widaningrum, S., & Salma, S. A. (2023) · International Journal of Innovation in Enterprise System · doi:10.25124/ijies.v7i02.240 · Cited by 3
“The questionnaire contains an assessment of the importance of vendor selection criteria using a scale of 1 to 9 to describe the level of importance of each criterion [13].”
MethodBaşar, R., & Yavuzyilmaz, O. (2023) · Akademik yaklaşımlar dergisi · doi:10.54688/ayd.1288616 · Cited by 3
Rasam, A. R. A., Mardie, D., Said, M. S. M., Hashim, N., & Ghazali, R. (2023) · PLANNING MALAYSIA · doi:10.21837/pm.v21i26.1266 · Cited by 3
“Therefore, based on this finalised pairwise matrix calculation result, the consistency ratio is 0.078 or 7.8%, accepted as the consistency ratio is not more than 0.1 or 10% (Saaty, 1987).”
MethodInfluentialNugroho, R. A., & Kohsaka, R. (2026) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2026.108339 · Cited by 2
Das, S., Biswas, M., & Ansari, K. (2026) · Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C · doi:10.1016/j.pce.2026.104767 · Cited by 2
Chiliza, S. G., Hingston, E., & Demlie, M. (2026) · GeoHazards · doi:10.3390/geohazards7040110 · Cited by 2
Spatial mapping of environmental risk in riverine wetlands: a case study of Crete, Greece
Kokolakis, S., & Kokinou, E. (2026) · Environmental Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12665-026-13032-x · Cited by 2
“AHP is a MCDA model based on a hierarchical process that structures complex decision-making problems by decomposing them into hierarchical levels and assigning relative weights through pairwise comparisons (Saaty 1987).”
Backes, J., Vogel, J., Geissler, A., Havranek, M. M., Schladerer, S. P., & Ehlig, D. (2026) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2026-020265 · Cited by 2
“To determine the relative weights of the prioritisation criteria, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied, 31 using pairwise comparisons to derive the relative importance ( w mh ) of each criterion ( c mih ).”
Urban traffic evaluation with social media data: A consensus-based LLM negotiation paradigm
Li, M., Fan, C., Yan, H.-Y., Wu, P.-K., Su, Z.-C., & Ma, W.-J. (2026) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2026.104980 · Cited by 2
Song, Y., Li, Z.-J., Fu, J.-X., Zheng, F., Kuzyakov, Y., & Li, Z. (2026) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148644 · Cited by 2
Susheen, A., Bisai, A., Patel, M., & Samadder, S. R. (2026) · Frontiers in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.3389/fceng.2026.1801053 · Cited by 2
Zhu, J., Gao, W.-S., Zhu, N., & Wang, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1824564 · Cited by 2
“The AHP is a subjective weighting method that calculates scores for individual indicators through expert ratings, thereby deriving a judgement matrix for pairwise comparisons between indicators (Whitaker, 1987).”
A Multi-Criteria Decision-Support Framework for Heritage Materials
Bernardo, G., & Iglesias, L. M. P. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16094564 · Cited by 2
Lin, Z.-Q., Feng, Y., Wu, J., Gong, D.-Z., Xiong, J.-R., Cao, X.-D., & Zheng, C. (2026) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110324 · Cited by 2
Zeqiri, A., & Youssef, A. B. (2026) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-026-07223-9 · Cited by 5
Parida, S., Mishra, D., Barik, T., Dash, D., & Tripathy, A. (2026) · Journal of composite materials · doi:10.1177/00219983261444593 · Cited by 2
Deng, L., Zhang, Y., & Tan, J. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.130773 · Cited by 1
Gorsevski, P., & Milevski, I. (2026) · ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf. · doi:10.3390/ijgi15040148 · Cited by 2
GIS-Driven Regional Assessment for Sustainable Data Center Siting in the United Kingdom
Hussain, S. N., Al-Mandhari, M., Ali, S. M. F., Zaib, A., & Ghosh, A. (2026) · Land · doi:10.3390/land15030516 · Cited by 4
Bitek, D., & Erenoğlu, R. C. (2026) · Jeomorfolojik Araştırmalar Dergisi · doi:10.46453/jader.1892689 · Cited by 2
Selecting AI-enabled music learning technologies in higher education using AHP and TOPSIS
Xu, M. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-43769-1 · Cited by 2
Garzo, G., Palumbo, A., & Giampaolo, M. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02920-2 · Cited by 3
“The use of the mean is justified in previous studies on expert judgment aggregation applied to complex decision-making contexts (Pigozzi 2020; Saaty 1987).”
Akher, M. A., Haque, A., Amin, M. A., & Saha, O. R. (2026) · Discover Geoscience · doi:10.1007/s44288-026-00470-0 · Cited by 2
“Among the various MCDA techniques, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), developed by Saaty [40], remains the most effective and commonly used method for this purpose [41].”
InfluentialIntegrated EFA–AHP decision-making framework for fixed offshore wind energy substructures
Lee, S., Kang, Y., Kim, Y., Kim, S., & Zi, G. (2026) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.124094 · Cited by 2
Mudashiru, S. A., Mogaji, K. A., & Ozegin, K. O. (2026) · Geosystems and Geoenvironment · doi:10.1016/j.geogeo.2026.100524 · Cited by 2
Xu, H.-Z., Zhang, H., Wang, Z.-Z., Zhou, W.-D., Wang, J.-T., Zhou, W., & Wang, C.-W. (2026) · Petroleum · doi:10.1016/j.petlm.2026.03.008 · Cited by 2
Wang, J.-X., Feng, C., Zhu, J.-N., Zhang, S.-H., & Cheng, R. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16052360 · Cited by 2
Loganathan, S., & Sathiyamoorthy, M. (2026) · Applied Water Science · doi:10.1007/s13201-026-02763-8 · Cited by 2
“AHP, created by Saaty (1987), is a relatively simple and intuitive method that allows users to take a systematic and structured approach to decision-making.”
Yadav, S., Singh, D., & Kant, R. (2026) · Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s41660-026-00691-3 · Cited by 2
“In the 1987 s, Saaty introduced the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as an influential method for decision-making (Saaty 1987 ).”
Kirkby, K., Kelley, J. M., Ellis, B., Lawson, J., Nunn, C., Darbyshire, R. O., & Pardoe, J. (2026) · International journal of biometeorology · doi:10.1007/s00484-025-03100-5 · Cited by 2
“This AHP process (Romeijn et al. 2016; Saaty 1980, 1987, 1994) allows for the amalgamation of orthogonal or competing variables into an overarching climate suitability metric.”
Xu, X., Duan, X., Haseeb, M., Tahir, Z., Mahmood, S. A., Rehman, T., Ambreen, R., Faqeih, K., Alamri, S. M., Alamery, E., et al. (2026) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.70400 · Cited by 2
“The AHP is an analytical multi-criteria decision-making method (Whitaker 1987).”
Doc2AHP: Inferring Structured Multi-Criteria Decision Models via Semantic Trees with LLMs
Wu, H.-J., Zhou, S., Zhang, H.-X., & Chen, W. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.16479 · Cited by 2
“1 [ Saaty, 1987 ] ).”
Han, Y., Li, B., & Zhang, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1736308 · Cited by 2
Mistri, P., Das, S., Jaman, M. H., Roy, S., Chatterjee, J., & Sengupta, S. (2026) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.147235 · Cited by 2
Asare-Addo, M., Couch, W. W., Maclaurin, G., Etienne, B., & Mahoney, C. (2026) · Energy Nexus · doi:10.1016/j.nexus.2026.100629 · Cited by 2
Mahboob, M., Zeb, A., & Zhao, H. (2026) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2026.120360 · Cited by 2
Li, J., Luo, L., Chen, J., Wei, S., & Li, B. (2026) · Sustainable Energy Grids and Networks · doi:10.1016/j.segan.2026.102132
Analysis of local scale suitability for the development of hydrogen infrastructures using GIS
Coquette, D., Lauven, L.-P., & Faulstich, M. (2025) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-025-01247-6 · Cited by 2
Chen, B., Zhang, Z., Xiao, Y.-C., Ding, H., Lin, S., & Dong, M. (2025) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr13124048 · Cited by 2
Ptacek, M., Frick, F., & Sauer, J. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.128106 · Cited by 2
Daoud, A. M. A., Abir, M. A., Kazem, M. M., Satti, A. M. N., Shebl, A., Mohamed, M. A., Agyemfra, G. J., Elrasheed, A. A., Csámer, Á., & Rózsa, P. (2025) · Geomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk · doi:10.1080/19475705.2025.2593297 · Cited by 2
“The AHP, developed by Saaty (1987), is a structured decision-making tool used to analyze complex problems by breaking them down into a hierarchy of simpler components.”
InfluentialGuarino, S., Faramondi, L., Oliva, G., Prete, E. D., Flammini, F., & Setola, R. (2025) · Future generations computer systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2025.108306 · Cited by 2
MCDM GIS framework for wind energy sites suitability in Algeria's northwest
Hafida, D. N., Louassa, S., & Kheder-Haddouche, S. (2025) · Energy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1016/j.esd.2025.101836 · Cited by 2
Subcontractor Selection for a Construction Project: Optimal Plan
Bingol, B. N., Arditi, D., & Polat, G. (2025) · Journal of construction engineering and management · doi:10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-16409 · Cited by 2
Wadi, D., Fuad, A.-T., & Mustafa, K. (2025) · Scientific African · doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e03143 · Cited by 2
Lumbantobing, R. D. H., Ratnayake, R. M. C., Simatupang, T. M., Okdinawati, L., & Mulyono, N. B. (2025) · Agriculture & Food Security · doi:10.1186/s40066-025-00560-1 · Cited by 2
“The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a method for the Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM) process, which aims to determine the relative importance level of the studied criteria [59], is used mainly in DTRMASC’s SFD modeling in order to handle the problem of variable granularity.”
Mathur, M., & Mathur, P. (2025) · Environmental Monitoring & Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-025-14840-7 · Cited by 2
Kassaw, D., & Nebere, A. (2025) · Environmental Systems Research · doi:10.1186/s40068-025-00427-1 · Cited by 2
“The random inconsistency index (RI) is standardized by Saaty (1987) and its value varies with the number of connected aspects (n), RI = 1.12 for n = 5.”
InfluentialThu, T. M., Songsom, V., Suteerasak, T., & Latt, K. T. (2025) · ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf. · doi:10.3390/ijgi14120460 · Cited by 2
Zhou, Y., Rees, J., Matcham, F., Antonelli, M., Sebastien Ourselin, A., & Liu, W. (2026) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/88263 · Cited by 2
“By integrating qualitative focus group analysis, systematic literature search, and expert consultation, this study established a comprehensive design indicator framework based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [32].”
Lappas, P. Z., & Symeonidis, G. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13233737 · Cited by 3
Biomass-Based Nanoengineered Cooling Geotextile for Permafrost Thawing Prevention
Xu, W., Liu, X., Yan, W., Tian, Y., Xu, Y., Zhu, W., Mohammad, N. M., Niu, Z., Liu, Y., Deng, P., et al. (2025) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c06567 · Cited by 2
Modeling weights for co-location feasibility in hybrid wind-wave device
Aristondo, O., Ulazia, A., & Ezpeleta, H. (2025) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.138548 · Cited by 2
A Novel Fire Hazard Evaluation Method for Cable Sheaths Under Various Ageing Conditions
Liu, H., Wang, W., Yan, L., & Xu, Z.-S. (2025) · Fire safety journal · doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104572 · Cited by 2
Khodadoust, H., Vafaie, F., & Hadipour, V. (2025) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118865 · Cited by 2
Сотников, Е., Onglassynov, Z., Kanafin, K., Berndtsson, R., Rakhimova, V., Miroshnichenko, O., Gabdulina, S., & Tussupova, K. (2025) · Water · doi:10.3390/w17202985 · Cited by 2
Ranking the risks of India's coal phase-down: An analytical hierarchy process approach
Pandey, J. G., & Kumar, A. (2025) · Energy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1016/j.esd.2025.101824 · Cited by 2
Faruk, M. O., Hasan, I., Dey, J., Ovi, M. H., Katha, Z. T., & Goni, M. O. (2025) · Nature-Based Solutions · doi:10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100279 · Cited by 2
Ranking and sorting the Pareto front in optimal shell structure design
Vatandoost, M., Golabchi, M., Ekhlassi, A., Rahbar, M., & von Buelow, P. (2025) · Frontiers of Architectural Research · doi:10.1016/j.foar.2025.07.006 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Saaty, R. W.
- Corresponding author
- Saaty, R.W.
- Venue
- Mathematical Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3-5
- Pages
- 161-176
- ISSN
- 0270-0255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046078150
- Cited by
- 5,380
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 623 · 2025: 735 · 2024: 697 · 2023: 662 · 2022: 518 · 2021: 481 · 2020: 382 · 2019: 284 · 2018: 226 · 2017: 173 · 2016: 124 · 2015: 107 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 4.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Mathematical Modelling (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Strategic Planning and Analysis
- Keywords
- analytic hierarchy process, ratio scale, measurement theory, axioms, inconsistency, rank preservation, reversal, absolute measurement, relative measurement, multi-criteria decision making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review