The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Operations strategy: A literature review
Abstract
Competitive pressures on American business have created the need for improved understanding and practice of operations strategy. Over the past 20 years some 80 articles and several books have been written on the subject. These writings, while diverse in nature and placement, serve to shape what we know about operations strategy and the opportunities for improved practice and meaningful research. This paper examines an underlying argument that exists within the literature that proper strategic positioning or aligning of operations capabilities can significantly impact competitive strength and business performance of an organization. The discussion is organized around four related premises: (1) that there exists a strategic, as opposed to a tactical, view of operations, (2) that there must be some synergistic process of integrating business and operations strategic issues, (3) that there are operations decision or policy areas which demonstrate strategic opportunities, and (4) that conceptual structures exist by which to target and focus operations strategy. The paper concludes that the literature and emerging research support each of these premises to varying degrees. The authors believe that further understanding of these premises could be benefited by more careful and consistent definition of operations strategy concepts and terminology, by more attention being placed on the content and process of operations strategy, by more empirical study, and finally by more emphasis being placed on service operations strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The servitization of manufacturing: A review of literature and reflection on future challenges
Baines, T. S., Lightfoot, H. W., Benedettini, O., & Kay, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/17410380910960984 · Cited by 1,541
THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES ON MANUFACTURING PERFORMANCE.
Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256982 · Cited by 1,312
Kache, F., & Seuring, S. (2017) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-02-2015-0078 · Cited by 938
Manufacturing strategy in context: environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy
Ward, P. T., & Duray, R. (2000) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(99)00021-2 · Cited by 658
Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001 · Cited by 537
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, J. C., Cleveland, G., & Schroeder, R. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-158
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2076494901
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Operations strategy: A literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0272-6963(89)90016-8
- The paper
- Anderson, J. C., Cleveland, G., & Schroeder, R. G. (1989). Operations strategy: A literature review. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(89)90016-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.