The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Alternative quality improvement practices and organization performance
Abstract
Quality improvement is a highly desired objective in the fiercely competitive international business world, yet it remains elusive to many US organizations. This study relates alternative quality improvement approaches to actual operating and financial performance. Productivity improvement approaches are also investigated and related to performance to define better the relationship between quality and productivity. In this study, multiple quality and productivity approaches are correlated to eight quality, three operating, and three financial performance measures for 187 US business firms. Results indicate a strong relationship between a quality improvement approach and performance quality. The relationship between a quality improvement approach and operating or financial performance is weaker, but significant. Productivity improvement approaches also help predict quality, operating, and financial performance — often similarly to quality improvement approaches. This study suggests that the profile of quality and productivity improvement approach should vary, depending upon whether the firm is most interested in performance quality, operating improvement, or financial performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance
Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2003) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00108-0 · Cited by 2,897
Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2006) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.03.033 · Cited by 451
Sila, I., & Ebrahimpour, M. (2002) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/02656710210434801 · Cited by 441
A Contingent View of Quality Management‐The Impact of International Competition on Quality
Das, A., Handfield, R. B., Calantone, R. J., & Ghosh, S. (2000) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2000.tb00938.x · Cited by 331
Kauppi, K., Brandon‐Jones, A., Ronchi, S., & van Raaij, E. M. (2013) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2011-0445 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Adam, E. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-44
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2164384370
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternative quality improvement practices and organization performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0272-6963(94)90004-3
- The paper
- Adam, E. E. (1994). Alternative quality improvement practices and organization performance. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(94)90004-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.