Cited by 115Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonclinical panickers: A critical review

Norton, G.Ron, Cox, Brian J., Malan, Jeff·1992·Clinical Psychology Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0272-7358(92)90110-t

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 115

Metadata

Authors
Norton, G. R., Cox, B. J., & Malan, J.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • The University of Winnipeg (CA)
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-01
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
121-139
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164483219
Cited by
115
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
panic attacks, prevalence, psychophysiological responses, depression, anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review