Cited by 224Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Relaxation-induced anxiety: Paradoxical anxiety enhancement due to relaxation training

Heide, Frederick J., Borkovec, T. D.·1983·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.51.2.171

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heide, F. J., & Borkovec, T. D.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1983
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
171-182
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2028024584
Cited by
223
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
11.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
relaxation training, relaxation response
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Arousal, Female, Humans, Male, Muscle Relaxation, Relaxation Therapy, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review