The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-term experiments on man's stay in biological life-support system
Abstract
We describe the experimental system having maximal possible closure of material recycling in an ecosystem, including people and plants, which was carried out in a hermetically sealed experimental complex "BIOS-3", 315 m2 in volume. The system included 2 experimentators and 3 phytotrons with plants (total sowing area of 63 m2). Plants were grown with round-the-clock lamp irradiation with 130 Wm-2 PAR intensity. The plants production was food for people. Water exchange of ecosystem, as wall as gas exchange, was fully closed excluding liquids and gas samples taken for chemical analysis outside the system. The total closure of material turnover constituted 91%. Health state of the crew was estimated before, during and after the experiment. A 5-months period did not affect their health. The experiments carried out prove that the closed ecosystem of "man-plants" is a prototype of a life-support system for long-term space expeditions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Since the concept of ECLSS was formally proposed by NASA, a series of ecosystems have been developed to simulate the lives of humans in the planet cabin environment by providing necessary survival resources for a period of time.”
From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
In the citing paper
“These ecosystems mainly include ECLSS and Controlled Ecological Life-Support System (CELSS) by NASA, BIOS series by Soviet Union/Russia, Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative (MELiSSA) by European Space Agency (ESA), CELSS Integrated Experimental Platform and Lunar Palace by China, and Closed Ecological Experimental Facility (CEEF) by Japan. 47-52”
From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
Citations
Cites
‘Life support system with autonomous control employing plant photosynthesis’.
Gitelson, I. I., Terskov, I. A., Kovrov, B. G., Sidko, F. Y., Lisovsky, G. M., Okladnikov, Y. N., Belyanin, V. N., Trubachov, I. N., & Rerberg, M. S. (1976) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/0094-5765(76)90103-x · Cited by 46
Self-citationKirensky, L. V., Gitelson, I. I., Terskov, I. A., Bg, K., Lisovsky, G. M., & Okladnikov, Y. N. (1971) · PubMed · Cited by 13
Self-citation[Experimental ecological systems including man].
Gitel'zon, I. I., Bg, K., Gm, L., IuN, O., & Ms, R. (1975) · PubMed · Cited by 11
Method and Technique of Wheat Continuous Culture As a Link of Life Support System
Lisovsky, G. M., Bg, K., Terskov, I. A., & Gitelson, I. I. (1969) · sts · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Terskov, 1974, The experiment on introducing vegetable plants in a closed gas-exchange biological life-support system, Space Biology and Airspace Medicine, 33
- Terskov, 1978, The Possibility to Use Higher Plants in Life-Support System at the Moon, Space Biology and Airspace Medicine, 3, 63
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review and analysis of over 40 years of space plant growth systems
Zabel, P., Bamsey, M., Schubert, D., & Tajmar, M. (2016) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2016.06.004 · Cited by 207
‘Bios-3: siberian experiments in bioregenerative life support’.
Salisbury, F. B., Gitelson, J. I., & Lisovsky, G. M. (1997) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1313164 · Cited by 178
Agriculture for space: People and places paving the way
Wheeler, R. M. (2017) · Open Agriculture · doi:10.1515/opag-2017-0002 · Cited by 167
Fu, Y., Li, L., Xie, B., Dong, C., Wang, M., Jia, B., Shao, L., Dong, Y., Deng, S., Liu, H., et al. (2016) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2016.1477 · Cited by 164
Overview of the Lunar In Situ Resource Utilization Techniques for Future Lunar Missions
Zhang, P., Dai, W., Niu, R., Zhang, G. C., Liu, G., Liu, X., Zheng, B. R., Wang, Z., Zheng, H., Liu, C., et al. (2023) · Space Science & Technology · doi:10.34133/space.0037 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Gitelson, I. I., Terskov, I. A., Kovrov, B. G., Lisovskii, G. M., Okladnikov, Y. N., Sid'ko, F. Y., Trubachev, I. N., Shilenko, M. P., Alekseev, S. S., Pan'kova, I. M., & Tirranen, L. S.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Biophysics (RU)
- Venue
- Advances in Space Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 65-71
- ISSN
- 0273-1177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020009588
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in Space Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
- Keywords
- closed ecological systems, life support systems, long-duration spaceflight, material recycling, phytotron, crew health
- MeSH terms
- Air Conditioning, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Life Support Systems, Light, Photosynthesis, Plants, Water, Triticum, Ecological Systems, Closed, Waste Management, Biomass, Crops, Agricultural, Plant Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
