PreprintCited by 27Space Exploration and TechnologyGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life

Establishment of a closed artificial ecosystem to ensure human long-term survival on the moon

Open access
Fu, Yuming, Yi, Zhihao, Du, Yao, Liu, Hui, Xie, Beizhen, Liu, Hong·2021·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Bioregenerative life support system (BLSS) is a critical technology maintaining long-term human survival on the Moon or other extraterrestrial bodies. In the current study, we carried out a 370-day integrated high-closure experiment (“Lunar Palace 365” experiment) on the Earth in an upgraded ground-based BLSS experimental facility called “Lunar Palace 1”. This experiment was designed to develop techniques to run and adjust system stability under long-term operation and crew shift change conditions. Eight volunteering crew members were divided into two groups with three time phases: Group I stayed in the cabin for the initial 60-day phase; Group II inhabited the cabin instead for a record-breaking duration of 200 days as the second phase; Group I re-entered the cabin, replaced Group II and stayed for the last 105 days. Our results demonstrated the BLSS had excellent stability with a material closure degree of 98.2%. Levels of O 2 , CO 2 and trace harmful gases were well controlled within ranges optimal for crew health and plant production. The system exhibited a strong robustness and could quickly minimize effects of disturbances through self-feedback adjustments. The efficiency of plant production completely met the crew’s need of plant-based food. The purification efficiency of domestic and sanitary wastewater was up to irrigation standards, and the recovery rate of urine and solid waste achieved 99.7% and 67%, respectively. These results are valuable for further optimization of the BLSS in a lunar base and computer simulations of similar systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.01.12.426282

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since the concept of ECLSS was formally proposed by NASA, a series of ecosystems have been developed to simulate the lives of humans in the planet cabin environment by providing necessary survival resources for a period of time.

    “Since the concept of ECLSS was formally proposed by NASA, a series of ecosystems have been developed to simulate the lives of humans in the planet cabin environment by providing necessary survival resources for a period of time.”

    From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Introduction describes several ground-based, crewed simulations of closed life-support ecosystems, and the Abstract reports a 370-day experiment that supplied air, water, and plant-based food in a lunar-base-like habitat. Our copy does not say that NASA formally proposed the concept of ECLSS; it discusses these simulations as BLSS experiments. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These ecosystems mainly include ECLSS and CELSS by NASA, BIOS series by Soviet Union/Russia, MELiSSA by ESA, CELSS Integrated Experimental Platform and Lunar Palace by China, and CEEF by Japan.

    “These ecosystems mainly include ECLSS and Controlled Ecological Life-Support System (CELSS) by NASA, BIOS series by Soviet Union/Russia, Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative (MELiSSA) by European Space Agency (ESA), CELSS Integrated Experimental Platform and Lunar Palace by China, and Closed Ecological Experimental Facility (CEEF) by Japan. 47-52”

    From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Introduction (page not provided) names Russia’s BIOS-3, Japan’s CEEF, and the European Union’s MELiSSA, and describes Chinese CELSS experiments and Lunar Palace 1. It does not identify NASA’s ECLSS or CELSS; for the United States, it names BIO-Plex instead. Nor does it use the name “CELSS Integrated Experimental Platform” for the Chinese experiment. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Nelson, M., Pechurkin, N. S., Allen, J. P., Somova, L. A. & Gitelson, J. I. in Environmental Biotechnology. 517-565 (Springer, 2010).
  2. Häder, D.-P., Braun, M. & Hemmersbach, R. in Gravitational Biology I 113-122 (Springer, 2018).
  3. Yang, Y., Wang, G. & Pan, X. China food composition. Peking University Medical Press, Beijing 329 (2002).
  4. Fengtao, G., Zhongquan, L. & Guogen, C. Revision of Allowable Concentrations of Atmospheric Components in Nuclear Submarines (MAC GJB11-84). JOURNAL OF NAVY MEDICINE, 7 (1999).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fu, Y., Yi, Z., Du, Y., Liu, H., Xie, B., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
Beihang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Hong
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-01-14
OpenAlex
W3118274699
Cited by
27
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Keywords
bioregenerative life support, lunar base, crew rotation, system stability, plant-based food production, wastewater treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review