From vice to madness: The semantics of naturalistic and personalistic understandings in Trinidadian local medicine
Abstract
Whilst the common analytical distinction between 'naturalistic' and 'personalistic' paradigms of medical knowledge has some immediate heuristic value and may indeed closely resemble the explicit schema elaborated by informants, interpretation of the semantics of bush medicine and madness in Creole Trinidad suggests that the two types of knowledge are not incompatible, nor mutually exclusive, nor distinct. The vices of ganja and rum use may be interpreted within the hot-cold classification of bush medicine but, like other vices and like the more 'intrapersonal' categories of pressure, grinding, studiation and tabanka, they may be understood as leading to madness. A common idiom of opposition and catharsis unites them, providing a higher level of analytical generality manifest in a range of local social institutions, and one rooted in post-colonial Afro-Caribbean experience and ideology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Littlewood (1988) argued that the two types of knowledge (personalistic and naturalistic) are not incompatible, nor mutually exclusive, nor distinct.
“In applying Foster's (1976) notions of personalistic and naturalistic causality of illness to bush medicine in Trinidad, Littlewood (1988) argued that 'the two types of knowledge are not incompatible, nor mutually exclusive, nor distinct' (Littlewood 1988: 129).”
From ‘Traditional’ Healers, Speaking and Motivation in Vava'u, Tonga: Explaining Syncretism and Addressing Health Policy (2010) · cites this paper as Littlewood 1988
Littlewood (1988) emphasised Foster's notion as a heuristic model to uncover the general schema of illness in Trinidad and argued that in many instances bush medicine could be seen as naturalistic in aetiology.
“Littlewood (1988) emphasised Foster's notion as a heuristic model to uncover the general schema of illness in Trinidad and argued that in many instances bush medicine could be seen as naturalistic in aetiology.”
From ‘Traditional’ Healers, Speaking and Motivation in Vava'u, Tonga: Explaining Syncretism and Addressing Health Policy (2010) · cites this paper as Littlewood 1988
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yang, L. H., Lo, G., WonPat-Borja, A. J., Singla, D. R., Link, B. G., & Phillips, M. R. (2012) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-011-0452-y · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Poltorak, M. (2010) · Oceania · doi:10.1002/j.1834-4461.2010.tb00069.x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Littlewood, R.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Littlewood, Roland
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1988-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-148
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986007284
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 30.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Caribbean history, culture, and politics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Keywords
- bush medicine, madness, Ganja, rum, vice, grinding
- MeSH terms
- Alcoholism, Mental Disorders, Marijuana Abuse, Developing Countries, Humans, Magic, Medicine, Traditional, Psychopathology, Trinidad and Tobago
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review