Cited by 53Caribbean history, culture, and politicsHistorical Psychiatry and Medical PracticesAnthropological Studies and Insights

From vice to madness: The semantics of naturalistic and personalistic understandings in Trinidadian local medicine

Littlewood, Roland·1988·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Whilst the common analytical distinction between 'naturalistic' and 'personalistic' paradigms of medical knowledge has some immediate heuristic value and may indeed closely resemble the explicit schema elaborated by informants, interpretation of the semantics of bush medicine and madness in Creole Trinidad suggests that the two types of knowledge are not incompatible, nor mutually exclusive, nor distinct. The vices of ganja and rum use may be interpreted within the hot-cold classification of bush medicine but, like other vices and like the more 'intrapersonal' categories of pressure, grinding, studiation and tabanka, they may be understood as leading to madness. A common idiom of opposition and catharsis unites them, providing a higher level of analytical generality manifest in a range of local social institutions, and one rooted in post-colonial Afro-Caribbean experience and ideology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90322-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Littlewood (1988) argued that the two types of knowledge (personalistic and naturalistic) are not incompatible, nor mutually exclusive, nor distinct.

    “In applying Foster's (1976) notions of personalistic and naturalistic causality of illness to bush medicine in Trinidad, Littlewood (1988) argued that 'the two types of knowledge are not incompatible, nor mutually exclusive, nor distinct' (Littlewood 1988: 129).”
  • Littlewood (1988) emphasised Foster's notion as a heuristic model to uncover the general schema of illness in Trinidad and argued that in many instances bush medicine could be seen as naturalistic in aetiology.

    “Littlewood (1988) emphasised Foster's notion as a heuristic model to uncover the general schema of illness in Trinidad and argued that in many instances bush medicine could be seen as naturalistic in aetiology.”

Cited by

Authors
Littlewood, R.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Littlewood, Roland
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-01
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
129-148
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986007284
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
30.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Caribbean history, culture, and politics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
Keywords
bush medicine, madness, Ganja, rum, vice, grinding
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Mental Disorders, Marijuana Abuse, Developing Countries, Humans, Magic, Medicine, Traditional, Psychopathology, Trinidad and Tobago

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review