The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marriage protection and marriage selection—Prospective evidence for reciprocal effects of marital status and health
Open accessAbstract
Married adults are generally healthier than unmarried adults. It has been hypothesized that marriage is associated with good health because marriage has beneficial effects on health (marriage protection effects) and/or because healthier individuals are more likely to marry and to stay married (marriage selection effects). To investigate these hypotheses, this study analyzes prospective panel data for a large national sample of women in the U.S. (the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women). The women were aged 24-34 yr at the beginning of two successive five-year follow-up intervals. Analyses of the prospective data indicate that there were significant marriage protection effects, but only among women who were not employed. Specifically, for women who were not employed, married women had better health trends than unmarried women in each follow-up interval. It appears that marriage had beneficial effects on health for women who did not have a job which could provide an alternative source of financial resources and social support. In addition, analyses of the prospective data provide limited evidence for marriage selection effects. Specifically, women who had better health initially were more likely to marry and less likely to experience marital dissolution, but only for women who were not employed full-time and only during the first follow-up interval. Thus, the prospective evidence suggests that, for women who were not employed, both marriage protection and marriage selection effects contributed to the marital status differential in health observed in cross-sectional data. In contrast, neither marriage protection nor marriage selection effects were observed for women who were employed full-time. As would be expected, the cross-sectional data show that marital status differentials in health were large and highly significant for women who were not employed, whereas marital status differentials in health were much smaller and often not significant for employed women. Women who were neither married nor employed had particularly poor health. Additional evidence indicates that the women who were neither married nor employed suffered from multiple interacting disadvantages, including poor health, low incomes, and sociodemographic characteristics which contributed to difficulty in obtaining employment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social and Economic Consequences of Overweight in Adolescence and Young Adulthood
Gortmaker, S. L., Must, A., Perrin, J. M., Sobol, A. M., & Dietz, W. H. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199309303291406 · Cited by 1,610
HOUSE, J. S., ROBBINS, C., & METZNER, H. L. (1982) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113387 · Cited by 1,381
Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior
Umberson, D. (1992) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90259-s · Cited by 1,357
The Impact of the Family on Health: The Decade in Review
Ross, C. E., Mirowsky, J., & Goldsteen, K. (1990) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/353319 · Cited by 910
Burman, B., & Margolin, G. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.39 · Cited by 730
Mortality Differentials by Marital Status: An International Comparison
Hu, Y., & Goldman, N. (1990) · Demography · doi:10.2307/2061451 · Cited by 614
Sex, Marital Status, and Mortality
Gove, W. R. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225505 · Cited by 579
SOCIAL NETWORK TIES AND MORTALITY AMONG TILE ELDERLY IN THE ALAMEDA COUNTY STUDY
SEEMAN, T. E., KAPLAN, G. A., KNUDSEN, L., COHEN, R., & GURALNIK, J. (1987) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114711 · Cited by 557
SOCIAL TIES AND MORTALITY IN EVANS COUNTY, GEORGIA
SCHOENBACH, V. J., KAPLAN, B. H., FREDMAN, L., & KLEINBAUM, D. G. (1986) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114278 · Cited by 503
Gender differences in social support and physical health.
Shumaker, S. A., & Hill, D. R. (1991) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.10.2.102 · Cited by 472
Cited by
Qin, P., Agerbo, E., & Mortensen, P. B. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.765 · Cited by 954
Schäfer, I., Hansen, H., Schön, G., Höfels, S., Altiner, A., Dahlhaus, A., Gensichen, J., Riedel-Heller, S., Weyerer, S., Blank, W. A., et al. (2012) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-89 · Cited by 296
Archie, E. A., Tung, J., Clark, M., Altmann, J., & Alberts, S. C. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1261 · Cited by 259
van Gelder, B. M., Tijhuis, M., Kalmijn, S., Giampaoli, S., Nissinen, A., & Kromhout, D. (2006) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/61.4.p213 · Cited by 197
How Does Marriage Affect Physical and Psychological Health? A Survey of the Longitudinal Evidence
Wilson, C. M., & Oswald, A. J. (2005) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.735205 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Waldron, I., Hughes, M. E., & Brooks, T. L.
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-123
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032732638
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 16.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marriage protection and marriage selection—Prospective evidence for reciprocal effects of marital status and health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00347-9
- The paper
- Waldron, I., Hughes, M. E., & Brooks, T. L. (1996). Marriage protection and marriage selection—Prospective evidence for reciprocal effects of marital status and health. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00347-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.