Cited by 197Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomes

Marital status and living situation during a 5-year period are associated with a subsequent 10-year cognitive decline in older men: The FINE Study

Open access
van Gelder, B. M., Tijhuis, M., Kalmijn, S., Giampaoli, S., Nissinen, A., Kromhout, D.·2006·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

We investigate the association between marital status and living situation (over 5 years) on 10-year subsequent cognitive decline. The study population consisted of 1,042 men aged 70-89 years in 1990, who participated in the longitudinal Finland, Italy, the Netherlands Elderly (known as FINE) Study. We measured cognition by using the Mini-Mental State Examination, and we assessed marital status (married vs unmarried) and living situation (living with others vs living alone) with a standardized questionnaire. We performed repeated measurement analyses and made adjustments for age, education, country, smoking, alcohol, chronic diseases, marital status or living situation, and baseline cognition. Men who lost a partner, who were unmarried, who started to live alone, or who lived alone during the 5-year period had at least a two times stronger subsequent cognitive decline compared with men who were married or who lived with someone in those years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/61.4.p213

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Living alone in later life may increase the risk of poor cognitive function.

    “Living alone in later life may increase the risk of poor cognitive function (Gow, Pattie, Whiteman, Whalley, & Deary, 2007;Gow, Corley, Starr, & Deary, 2013;van Gelder et al., 2006;Yaffe et al., 2009)”

    From Living alone and cognitive function in later life (2019) · cites this paper as van Gelder et al., 2006

  • Some studies have reported an association between living alone and poorer scores on tests of global cognitive function, immediate and delayed recall, orientation, processing speed, and IQ.

    “Some studies have reported an association between living alone and poorer scores on tests of global cognitive function (van Gelder et al., 2006;Yaffe et al., 2009), immediate and delayed recall, orientation (Mazzuco, Meggiolaro, Ongaro, & Toffolutti, 2016), processing speed (Gow et al., 2013), and IQ (Gow et al., 2007).”

    From Living alone and cognitive function in later life (2019) · cites this paper as van Gelder et al., 2006

  • Living with others may enhance cognitive function directly through the stimulation arising from regular social interaction with others.

    “From a cognitive reserve perspective, living with others may enhance cognitive function directly through the stimulation arising from regular social interaction with others (van Gelder et al., 2006).”

    From Living alone and cognitive function in later life (2019) · cites this paper as van Gelder et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Gelder, B. M., Tijhuis, M., Kalmijn, S., Giampaoli, S., Nissinen, A., & Kromhout, D.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2006-07-01
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
P213-P219
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2100551304
Cited by
197
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
marital status, living alone, cognitive decline, older men, widowhood, living arrangements, Mini-Mental State Examination
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Finland, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Hypertension, International Cooperation, Italy, Male, Netherlands, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Social Environment, Incidence, Prevalence, Marital Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review