The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography
(1958) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(58)90053-1 · Cited by 2,717
Cited by
Fundamentals of physiological computing
Fairclough, S. H. (2009) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.10.011 · Cited by 608
Wilson, G. F., & Russell, C. A. (2003) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.45.4.635.27088 · Cited by 375
Psychophysiology and adaptive automation
Byrne, E. A., & Parasuraman, R. (1996) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(95)05161-9 · Cited by 360
Pay attention!: designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement
Szafir, D., & Mutlu, B. (2012) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2207679 · Cited by 304
Abbass, H. A. (2019) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-018-9619-0 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Pope, A. T., Bogart, E. H., & Bartolome, D. S.
- Venue
- Biological Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 187-195
- ISSN
- 0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029517603
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0301-0511(95)05116-3
- The paper
- Pope, A. T., Bogart, E. H., & Bartolome, D. S. (1995). Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task. Biological Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(95)05116-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
