The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal fiscal and monetary policy in an economy without capital
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization
Strotz, R. H. (1955) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2295722 · Cited by 2,834
Cited by
Financial Development, Growth, and the Distribution of Income
Greenwood, J., & Jovanovic, B. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261720 · Cited by 2,469
A Positive Theory of Fiscal Deficits and Government Debt
Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (1990) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2298021 · Cited by 1,568
A Unified Framework for Monetary Theory and Policy Analysis
(2005) · doi:10.1086/429804 · Cited by 1,527
Alesina, A. (1988) · NBER Macroeconomics Annual · doi:10.1086/654070 · Cited by 723
(1994) · American Economic Review · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Lucas, R. E., & Stokey, N. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Monetary Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-93
- ISSN
- 0304-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088133319
- Cited by
- 1,875
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 60.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
