Cited by 135Consumer Market Behavior and PricingMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactEconomics of Agriculture and Food Markets

Scraped data and sticky prices

Open access
Cavallo, Alberto·2018·The Review of Economics and Statistics

Abstract

I use daily prices collected from online retailers in five countries to study the impact of measurement bias on three common price stickiness statistics. Relative to previous results, I find that online prices have longer durations, with fewer price changes close to 0, and hazard functions that initially increase over time. I show that time-averaging and imputed prices in scanner and CPI data can fully explain the differences with the literature. I then report summary statistics for the duration and size of price changes using scraped data collected from 181 retailers in 31 countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/rest_a_00652

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The adherence between online and offline price levels for multichannel retailers has already been proven across multiple countries.

    “The adherence between online and offline price levels for multichannel retailers has already been proven across multiple countries (Cavallo, 2017(Cavallo, , 2018)).”

    From Sanctions and Russian online prices (2024) · cites this paper as Cavallo, 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Boivin, Jean, H. E. C. Montréal, Marc P. Giannoni, and Ilian Mihov, "Sticky Prices and Monetary Policy: Evidence from Disaggregated U.S. Data," American Economic Review (2009), 350-384.
  2. Brynjolfsson, Erik, Astrid Andrea Dick, and Michael D. Smith, "A Nearly Perfect Market?" (2009), https://ssrn.com/abstract-450220.
  3. Lach, Saul, and Daniel Tsiddon, "Staggering and Synzhronization in {Price-Setting:} Evidence from Multiproduct Firms," American Economic Review 86 (1996), 1175-1196.
  4. Nakamura, Emi, and Jon Steinsson, "Five Facts about Prices: A Reevalu- ation of Menu Cost Models," Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (2008), 1415-1464.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavallo, A.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Cavallo, Alberto
Venue
The Review of Economics and Statistics
Published
2018-03
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
105-119
ISSN
  • 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9142
OpenAlex
W3124806009
Cited by
135
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
18.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Review of Economics and Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Keywords
price stickiness, measurement bias, price changes, price duration, hazard function, time averaging, consumer price index, scanner data, web scraping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review