The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Postsurgical pain relief: Patientsʼ status and nursesʼ medication choices
Abstract
This study consisted of two interrelated parts. In the first part, the adequacy of pain relief in hospitalized post-surgical patients was assessed and described and in the second part ways in which nurses on the same units chose analgesic medications were examined and analyzed. Pain was considered a subjective experience. Patients were interviewed, and their charts reviewed on the third postoperative day. The sample included 109 patients in 5 central Illinois hospitals. After all patient interviews were completed, 121 nurses on the same units responded to a questionnaire which included clinical vignettes. Results of the patient interviews indicated that 75.2% of these patients were in moderate or marked pain distress and that a general question did not adequately assess pain. Chart review indicated that these patients were actually receiving less narcotic analgesics than they could receive. Nurses were overly concerned about the possibility of addiction; choices of analgesic medications seemed irrational; and knowledge of the drugs was inadequate. Moreover, these nurses indicated that complete pain relief after surgery was not their major goal. In 2 sets of identical vignettes where the only difference was the sex of the patient, nurses selected less medication for pain for female patients (P < 0.001 and P < 0.025 respectively). Factors that nurses consider in administering and choosing postoperative analgesia are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Huskisson, E. C. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8 · Cited by 4,522
Undertreatment of Medical Inpatients with Narcotic Analgesics
MARKS, R. M., & SACHAR, E. J. (1973) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-78-2-173 · Cited by 1,094
Cultural Components in Responses to Pain1
Zborowski, M. (1952) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1952.tb01860.x · Cited by 881
Measurement of Subjective Responses: Quantitative Effects of Drugs
(1960) · Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1960.03020130117030 · Cited by 463
Kay, B. (1981) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1981.tb08653.x · Cited by 97
Watts, G. (1975) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(75)91774-2 · Cited by 22
Cited by
Gender variations in clinical pain experience
Unruh, A. M. (1996) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(95)00214-6 · Cited by 1,550
The unequal burden of pain: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in pain
Green, C. R., Anderson, K. O., Baker, T. A., Campbell, L. C., Decker, S., Fillingim, R. B., Kaloukalani, D. A., Lasch, K. E., Myers, C., Tait, R. C., et al. (2003) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1526-4637.2003.03034.x · Cited by 1,248
Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I. Evidence from published data
Dolin, S. J., Cashman, J. N., & Bland, J. M. (2002) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/89.3.409 · Cited by 737
Portenoy, R. K., Foley, K. M., & Inturrisi, C. E. (1990) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(90)90025-9 · Cited by 565
The prevalence of postoperative pain in a sample of 1490 surgical inpatients
Sommer, M., de Rijke, J. M., van Kleef, M., Kessels, A. G. H., Peters, M. L., Geurts, J. W. J. M., Gramke, H.-F., & Marcus, M. A. E. (2008) · European Journal of Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1017/s0265021507003031 · Cited by 471
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, F. L.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1980-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-274
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1565807472
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postsurgical pain relief: Patientsʼ status and nursesʼ medication choices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(80)90013-5
- The paper
- Cohen, F. L. (1980). Postsurgical pain relief: Patientsʼ status and nursesʼ medication choices. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(80)90013-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.