The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months following limb amputation
Abstract
The incidence and clinical picture of non-painful and painful phantom limb sensations as well as stump pain was studied in 58 patients 8 days and 6 months after limb amputation. The incidence of non-painful phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain 8 days after surgery was 84, 72 and 57%, respectively. Six months after amputation the corresponding figures were 90, 67 and 22%, respectively. Kinaesthetic sensations (feeling of length, volume or other spatial sensation of the affected limb) were present in 85% of the patients with phantom limb both immediately after surgery and 6 months later. However, 30% noticed a clear shortening of the phantom during the follow-up period; this was usually among patients with no phantom pain. Phantom pain was significantly more frequent in patients with pain in the limb the day before amputation than in those without preoperative limb pain. Of the 67% having some phantom pain at the latest interview 50% reported that pains were decreasing. Four patients (8%), however, reported that phantom pains were worse 6 months after amputation than originally. During the follow-up period the localization of phantom pains shifted from a proximal and distal distribution to a more distal localization. While knifelike, sticking phantom pains were most common immediately after surgery, squeezing or burning types of phantom pain were usually reported later in the course. Possible mechanisms for the present findings either in periphery, spinal cord or in the brain are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic postsurgical or posttraumatic pain
Schug, S. A., Lavand'homme, P., Barke, A., Korwisi, B., Rief, W., Treede, R.-D., & Pain, T. I. T. F. T. C. O. C. (2019) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001413 · Cited by 841
Bach, S., Noreng, M. F., & Tjéllden, N. U. (1988) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(88)90288-6 · Cited by 561
Effect of sensory discrimination training on cortical reorganisation and phantom limb pain
Flor, H., Denke, C., Schaefer, M., & Grüsser, S. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04890-x · Cited by 560
The effect of opioids on phantom limb pain and cortical reorganization
Huse, E., Larbig, W., Flor, H., & Birbaumer, N. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00385-7 · Cited by 309
Psychosocial predictors of long-term adjustment to lower-limb amputation and phantom limb pain
Hanley, M. A., Jensen, M. P., Ehde, D. M., Hoffman, A. J., Patterson, D. R., & Robinson, L. R. (2004) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638280410001708896 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, T. S., Krebs, B., Nielsen, J., & Rasmussen, P.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1983-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 243-256
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156830886
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months following limb amputation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(83)90097-0
- The paper
- Jensen, T. S., Krebs, B., Nielsen, J., & Rasmussen, P. (1983). Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months following limb amputation. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(83)90097-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.