The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The cognitive effects of the administration of narcotic analgesics in patients with cancer pain
Abstract
Forty patients with cancer pain receiving intermittent narcotics were admitted to a prospective study designed to assess the cognitive effects of narcotics. Twenty patients had undergone no change in narcotic dose or type greater than or equal to 7 days (stable dose, SD, group), and 20 patients had undergone an increase of greater than or equal to 30% in dose less than or equal to 3 days before (increased dose, ID, group). Age, primary tumor, type, dose and route of narcotic were not different between the SD and ID group. Cognitive tests (finger tapping, FT, 10 and 30 sec, arithmetic, A, reverse memory of digits, RM, and visual memory, VM) were performed in all patients before and 45 min after their morning dose of narcotics for 2 consecutive days. Mean percentual change in FT 10 sec, FT 30 sec, A, RM, and VM after the narcotic dose were 97 +/- 9%, 100 +/- 14%, 100 +/- 13%, 100 +/- 15%, 98 +/- 19%, in the SD group, vs. 77 +/- 14% (P less than 0.001), 83 +/- 13% (P less than 0.001), 124 +/- 21% (P less than 0.001), 60 +/- 21% (P less than 0.001) and 68 +/- 21% (P less than 0.001) in the ID group, respectively. Our results suggest that patients who undergo a significant increase in the dose of intermittent narcotics experience significant cognitive impairment, that disappears after 1 week of the increase. More research is needed to better characterize the cognitive toxicity of intermittent narcotics, and to determine the cognitive effects of long acting narcotics, continuous infusions, or of the addition of amphetamines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Automatic and effortful processes in memory.
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.356 · Cited by 2,812
Cited by
Effectiveness of opioids in the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain
Trescot, A. M. (2008) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2008/11/s181 · Cited by 169
Outcome of Chronic Opioid Therapy for Non-Cancer Pain
Haythornthwaite, J. A., Menefee, L. A., Quatrano-Piacentini, A. L., & Pappagallo, M. (1998) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(97)00352-7 · Cited by 126
Lawlor, P. G. (2002) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.10389 · Cited by 116
Effects of intermediate- and long-term use of opioids on cognition in patients with chronic pain
Chapman, S. L., Byas-Smith, M. G., & Reed, B. A. (2002) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200207001-00010 · Cited by 81
Chronic pain treatment with opioid analgesics: benefits versus harms of long-term therapy
Sehgal, N., Colson, J., & Smith, H. S. (2013) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/14737175.2013.846517 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruera, E., Macmillan, K., Hanson, J., & MacDonald, N. R.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-16
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973136081
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The cognitive effects of the administration of narcotic analgesics in patients with cancer pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(89)90169-3
- The paper
- Bruera, E., Macmillan, K., Hanson, J., & MacDonald, N. R. (1989). The cognitive effects of the administration of narcotic analgesics in patients with cancer pain. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(89)90169-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.