Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The cognitive effects of the administration of narcotic analgesics in patients with cancer pain

Bruera, Eduardo, Macmillan, Karen, Hanson, John, MacDonald, Neil R.·1989·Pain

Abstract

Forty patients with cancer pain receiving intermittent narcotics were admitted to a prospective study designed to assess the cognitive effects of narcotics. Twenty patients had undergone no change in narcotic dose or type greater than or equal to 7 days (stable dose, SD, group), and 20 patients had undergone an increase of greater than or equal to 30% in dose less than or equal to 3 days before (increased dose, ID, group). Age, primary tumor, type, dose and route of narcotic were not different between the SD and ID group. Cognitive tests (finger tapping, FT, 10 and 30 sec, arithmetic, A, reverse memory of digits, RM, and visual memory, VM) were performed in all patients before and 45 min after their morning dose of narcotics for 2 consecutive days. Mean percentual change in FT 10 sec, FT 30 sec, A, RM, and VM after the narcotic dose were 97 +/- 9%, 100 +/- 14%, 100 +/- 13%, 100 +/- 15%, 98 +/- 19%, in the SD group, vs. 77 +/- 14% (P less than 0.001), 83 +/- 13% (P less than 0.001), 124 +/- 21% (P less than 0.001), 60 +/- 21% (P less than 0.001) and 68 +/- 21% (P less than 0.001) in the ID group, respectively. Our results suggest that patients who undergo a significant increase in the dose of intermittent narcotics experience significant cognitive impairment, that disappears after 1 week of the increase. More research is needed to better characterize the cognitive toxicity of intermittent narcotics, and to determine the cognitive effects of long acting narcotics, continuous infusions, or of the addition of amphetamines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90169-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Bruera, E., Macmillan, K., Hanson, J., & MacDonald, N. R.
Venue
Pain
Published
1989-10
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
13-16
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973136081
Cited by
279
References
1
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The cognitive effects of the administration of narcotic analgesics in patients with cancer pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(89)90169-3
The paper
Bruera, E., Macmillan, K., Hanson, J., & MacDonald, N. R. (1989). The cognitive effects of the administration of narcotic analgesics in patients with cancer pain. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(89)90169-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.