The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breakthrough pain: definition, prevalence and characteristics
Abstract
In the cancer population, the term breakthrough pain typically refers to a transitory flare of pain in the setting of chronic pain managed with opioid drugs. The prevalence and characteristics of this phenomenon have not been defined, and its impact on patient care is unknown. We developed operational definitions for breakthrough pain and its major characteristics, and applied these in a prospective survey of patients with cancer pain. Data were collected during a 3 month period from consecutive patients who reported moderate pain or less for more than 12 h daily and stable opioid dosing for a minimum of 2 consecutive days. Of 63 patients surveyed, 41 (64%) reported breakthrough pain, transient flares of severe or excruciating pain. Fifty-one different pains were described (median 4 pains/day; range 1-3600). Pain characteristics were extremely varied. Twenty-two (43%) pains were paroxysmal in onset; the remainder were more gradual. The duration varied from seconds to hours (median/range: 30 min/1-240 min), and 21 (41%) were both paroxysmal and brief (lancinating pain). Fifteen (29%) of the pains were related to the fixed opioid dose, occurring solely at the end of the dosing interval. Twenty-eight (55%) of the pains were precipitated; of these, 22 were caused by an action of the patient (incident pain), and 6 were associated with a non-volitional precipitant, such as flatulence. The pathophysiology of the pain was believed to be somatic in 17 (33%), visceral in 10 (20%), neuropathic in 14 (27%), and mixed in 10 (20%). Pain was related to the tumor in 42 (82%), the effects of therapy in 7 (14%), and neither in 2 (4%). Diverse interventions were employed to manage these pains, with variable efficacy. These data clarify the spectrum of breakthrough pains and indicate their importance in cancer pain management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analgesic Drug Therapy in Cancer Pain: Principles and Practice
Foley, K. M., & Inturrisi, C. E. (1987) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30866-5 · Cited by 103
Cited by
Management of cancer pain in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines
Fallon, M., Giusti, R., Aielli, F., Hoskin, P., Rolke, R., Sharma, M., & Ripamonti, C. I. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy152 · Cited by 954
An international survey of cancer pain characteristics and syndromes
Caraceni, A., & Portenoy, R. K. (1999) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00073-1 · Cited by 632
Self-citationAddiction to opioids in chronic pain patients: A literature review
Højsted, J., & Sjøgren, P. (2007) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.08.004 · Cited by 424
Intranasal drug delivery: An efficient and non-invasive route for systemic administration
Grassin-Delyle, S., Buenestado, A., Naline, E., Faisy, C., Blouquit-Laye, S., Couderc, L.-J., Le Guen, M., Fischler, M., & Devillier, P. (2012) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.03.003 · Cited by 398
Opioid Guidelines in the Management of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain
Manchikanti, L. (2006) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2006/9/2 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Portenoy, R. K., & Hagen, N. A.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 273-281
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963668674
- Cited by
- 933
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breakthrough pain: definition, prevalence and characteristics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(90)90004-w
- The paper
- Portenoy, R. K., & Hagen, N. A. (1990). Breakthrough pain: definition, prevalence and characteristics. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(90)90004-w
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.