The DOI matches its Crossref record; 252 of the 252 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opioid Guidelines in the Management of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Opioid abuse has increased at an alarming rate. However, available evidence suggests a wide variance in the use of opioids, as documented by different medical specialties, medical boards, advocacy groups, and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). OBJECTIVES: The objective of these opioid guidelines by the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) is to provide guidance for the use of opioids for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain, to bring consistency in opioid philosophy among the many diverse groups involved, to improve the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain, and to reduce the incidence of drug diversion. DESIGN: A policy committee evaluated a systematic review of the available literature regarding opioid use in managing chronic non-cancer pain. This resulted in the formulation of the essentials of guidelines, a series of potential evidence linkages representing conclusions, followed by statements regarding relationships between clinical interventions and outcomes. METHODS: Consistent with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) hierarchical and comprehensive standards, the elements of the guideline preparation process included literature searches, literature synthesis, systematic review, consensus evaluation, open forum presentations, formal endorsement by the Board of Directors of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP), and blinded peer review. Evidence was designated based on scientific merit as Level I (conclusive), Level II (strong), Level III (moderate), Level IV (limited), or Level V (indeterminate). RESULTS: After an extensive review and analysis of the literature, the authors utilized two systematic reviews, two narrative reviews, 32 studies included in prior systematic reviews, and 10 additional studies in the synthesis of evidence. The evidence was limited. CONCLUSION: These guidelines evaluated the evidence for the use of opioids in the management of chronic non-cancer pain and recommendations for management. These guidelines are based on the best available scientific evidence and do not constitute inflexible treatment recommendations. Because of the changing body of evidence, this document is not intended to be a "standard of care."
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Hydromorphone for acute and chronic pain
Quigley, C. (2002) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003447 · Cited by 146
RetractedMeta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04337-3 · Cited by 5,373
Depression and Pain Comorbidity: A Literature Review
Bair, M. J., Robinson, R. L., Katon, W., & Kroenke, K. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.20.2433 · Cited by 3,463
Moher, D. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.15.1987 · Cited by 2,545
Tunis (2003) · doi:10.1001/jama.290.12.1624 · Cited by 1,724
Persistent Pain and Well-being: A World Health Organization Study in Primary Care
Gureje, O., Von Korff, M., Simon, G. E., & Gater, R. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.2.147 · Cited by 1,496
Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review of efficacy and safety
Kalso, E., Edwards, J. E., Moore, A. R., & McQuay, H. J. (2004) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.019 · Cited by 1,216
Drug Metabolism and Variability among Patients in Drug Response
Wilkinson, G. R. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra032424 · Cited by 1,185
Management of Pain in Elderly Patients With Cancer
Bernabei, R. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.279.23.1877 · Cited by 1,158
Cited by
Pharmacological Management of Persistent Pain in Older Persons
(2009) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00699.x · Cited by 916
Patterns of abuse among unintentional pharmaceutical overdose fatalities
Hall, A. J. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2008.802 · Cited by 815
Polydrug abuse: a review of opioid and benzodiazepine combination use
Jones, J. D., Mogali, S., & Comer, S. D. (2012) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.07.004 · Cited by 703
Substance Use Disorders in a Primary Care Sample Receiving Daily Opioid Therapy
Fleming, M. F., Balousek, S. L., Klessig, C. L., Mundt, M. P., & Brown, D. D. (2007) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.02.432 · Cited by 274
Doyle, H. H., Eidson, L. N., Sinkiewicz, D. M., & Murphy, A. Z. (2017) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2906-16.2017 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Manchikanti, L.
- Venue
- Pain Physician
- Published
- 2006-01-14
- Volume
- 1;9
- Issue
- 1;1
- Pages
- 2-39
- ISSN
- 1533-3159 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-1149
- OpenAlex
- W1776694187
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 252
- FWCI
- 23.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opioid Guidelines in the Management of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.36076/ppj.2006/9/2
- The paper
- Manchikanti, L. (2006). Opioid Guidelines in the Management of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain. Pain Physician. https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2006/9/2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.