Cited by 425Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Management and Opioid UseSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Addiction to opioids in chronic pain patients: A literature review

Højsted, Jette, Sjøgren, Per·2007·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Opioids have proven very useful for treatment of acute pain and cancer pain, and in the developed countries opioids are increasingly used for treatment of chronic non-malignant pain patients as well. This literature review aims at giving an overview of definitions, mechanisms, diagnostic criteria, incidence and prevalence of addiction in opioid treated pain patients, screening tools for assessing opioid addiction in chronic pain patients and recommendations regarding addiction problems in national and international guidelines for opioid treatment in cancer patients and chronic non-malignant pain patients. The review indicates that the prevalence of addiction varied from 0% up to 50% in chronic non-malignant pain patients, and from 0% to 7.7% in cancer patients depending of the subpopulation studied and the criteria used. The risk of addiction has to be considered when initiating long-term opioid treatment as addiction may result in poor pain control. Several screening tools were identified, but only a few were thoroughly validated with respect to validity and reliability. Most of the identified guidelines mention addiction as a potential problem. The guidelines in cancer pain management are concerned with the fact that pain may be under treated because of fear of addiction, and the guidelines in management of non-malignant pain patients include warnings of addiction. According to the literature, it seems appropriate and necessary to be aware of the problems associated with addiction during long-term opioid treatment, and specialised treatment facilities for pain management or addiction medicine should be consulted in these cases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.08.004

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 134 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Højsted, J., & Sjøgren, P.
Affiliations
Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Højsted, Jette
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
490-518
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W1968105689
Cited by
424
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 35
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
opioid use disorder, chronic non-cancer pain, cancer pain, addiction prevalence, addiction risk, pain management, addiction medicine
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Chronic Disease, Humans, Mass Screening, Opioid-Related Disorders, Neoplasms, Intractable Pain, Pain, Intractable, Surveys and Questionnaires, Incidence, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pain Clinics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review