The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Painful neuropathy: altered central processing maintained dynamically by peripheral input
Abstract
We performed sensory assessments before and during diagnostic tourniquet-cuff and local anesthetic blocks in 4 patients diagnosed with reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). All patients complained of mechano-allodynia; lightly touching the skin evoked an intense pain sensation. At detection levels, electrical stimuli were perceived as painful, suggesting that the mechano-allodynia was mediated by A beta low-threshold mechanoreceptor afferents. A beta-mediated allodynia was further supported by reaction time latencies to painful electrical stimuli at threshold for A-fiber activation and, in 1 patient, by differential cuff blocks which abolished A beta function and allodynia while thermal sensation (warm and cold) were preserved. Local anesthetic block of painful foci associated with previous trauma abolished mechano-allodynia, cold allodynia, and spontaneous pain in all patients and relieved the motor symptoms in 1 patient with tonic contractures of the toes. Tactile and thermal perception in the previously allodynic area was preserved. When the local anesthetic block waned, spontaneous pain, allodynia, and motor symptoms returned. We propose a model of neuropathic pain in which ongoing nociceptive afferent input from a peripheral focus dynamically maintains altered central processing that accounts for allodynia, spontaneous pain, and other sensory and motor abnormalities. Blocking the peripheral input causes the central processing to revert to normal, abolishing the symptoms for the duration of the block. The model accounts for sympathetically maintained (SMP) and sympathetically independent (SIP) pain. The peripheral input can be independent of sympathetic activity or driven completely or in part by activity in sympathetic efferents or by circulating catecholamines. The shared final common pathway may explain the common features of SMP and SIP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The induction of pain: an integrative review
Millan, M. J. (1999) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00048-3 · Cited by 1,774
Mechanisms of neuropathic pain
Campbell, J. N., & Meyer, R. A. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.021 · Cited by 1,471
Nociplastic pain: towards an understanding of prevalent pain conditions
Fitzcharles, M.-A., Cohen, S. P., Clauw, D. J., Littlejohn, G., Usui, C., & Häuser, W. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00392-5 · Cited by 1,253
Models and Mechanisms of Hyperalgesia and Allodynia
Sandkühler, J. (2009) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00025.2008 · Cited by 1,148
Allodynia and hyperalgesia in neuropathic pain: clinical manifestations and mechanisms
Jensen, T. S., & Finnerup, N. B. (2014) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70102-4 · Cited by 976
Metadata
- Authors
- Gracely, R. H., Lynch, S. A., & Bennett, G. J.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-194
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996108985
- Cited by
- 785
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Painful neuropathy: altered central processing maintained dynamically by peripheral input. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90259-e
- The paper
- Gracely, R. H., Lynch, S. A., & Bennett, G. J. (1992). Painful neuropathy: altered central processing maintained dynamically by peripheral input. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90259-e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.